Concealed conduction and dual pathway physiology of the atrioventricular node.

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol

Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Published: February 2004

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the relationship between concealed conduction and dual pathway physiology in the AV node, particularly how these factors play a role in AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, a common heart rhythm disorder.
  • Researchers conducted experiments on 20 patients with AV nodal reentry and 14 control patients, analyzing AV conduction curves before and after a procedure known as slow pathway ablation.
  • Findings show that while most patients exhibited duality in AV conduction without any blocked impulses, this duality significantly decreased in the presence of a blocked impulse; additionally, slow pathway ablation altered conduction characteristics, pointing to complex interactions between these physiological processes.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Both concealed conduction and dual pathway physiology are important electrophysiologic characteristics of the AV node. The interaction of AV nodal concealment and duality, however, is not clearly understood.

Methods And Results: The properties of AV conduction curves in the presence and absence of a conditioning blocked impulse were prospectively studied during premature atrial stimulation in 20 patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia before and after slow pathway ablation and in 14 control patients. AV nodal duality in the control conduction curve in the absence of a conditioning impulse was observed in 19 (95%) of 20 patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. However, AV nodal duality in the modulated conduction curve in the presence of a blocked impulse was only identified in 2 (10%) of 20 patients (2/20 vs 19/20, P < 0.0001). The modulated curve was characterized by a significantly longer AV nodal effective and functional refractory periods compared to the control curve (P < 0.0001) in both patients with and without AV nodal reentry and in AV nodal reentry patients after successful slow pathway ablation. The maximum AH interval (AH(max)) of the modulated curve was significantly shorter than the control curve in both patients with (217 +/- 74 ms vs 347 +/- 55 ms, P < 0.0001) and without AV nodal reentry (178 +/- 50 ms vs 214 +/- 54 ms, P = 0.02). AH(max) of the control curve was significantly longer in AV nodal reentry patients than in controls (P < 0.0001). AH(max) of the modulated curve, however, was not significantly different between the two groups. After slow pathway ablation, AH(max) of the control curve was significantly reduced (347 +/- 55 ms vs 191 +/- 40 ms, P < 0.0001). Significant reduction in AH(max) of the modulated curve was not observed.

Conclusion: An interaction of AV nodal concealed conduction and dual pathway physiology was demonstrated by our data. Slow pathway conduction of the AV node was prevented by the concealed beat in both patients with and without AV nodal reentry.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1540-8167.2004.03301.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients nodal
20
nodal reentry
20
slow pathway
16
modulated curve
16
control curve
16
concealed conduction
12
conduction dual
12
dual pathway
12
pathway physiology
12
nodal
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!