AI Article Synopsis

  • Intravenous bisphosphonates are the preferred treatment for metastatic bone disease, but they come with risks like infusion-related side effects and kidney toxicity.
  • There is a need for an effective oral option due to the inconvenience and gastrointestinal issues associated with oral bisphosphonates.
  • Oral ibandronate 50 mg has been shown in clinical trials to significantly reduce skeletal complications in breast cancer patients, offering a well-tolerated and convenient alternative to i.v. bisphosphonates.

Article Abstract

Although intravenous (i.v.) bisphosphonates are the standard of care for metastatic bone disease, they are less than ideal for many patients due to infusion-related adverse events (AEs), an increased risk of renal toxicity and the inconvenience of regular hospital visits. The use of oral bisphosphonate therapy is limited by concerns over efficacy and gastrointestinal (GI) side effects. There remains a clinical need for an oral bisphosphonate that offers equivalent efficacy to i.v. bisphosphonates, good tolerability and dosing convenience. Oral ibandronate, a highly potent, third-generation aminobisphosphonate, has been evaluated in phase III clinical trials of patients with bone metastases from breast cancer. In two pooled phase III studies, patients with breast cancer and bone metastases were randomised to receive oral ibandronate 50 mg (n=287) or placebo (n=277) once daily for up to 96 weeks. The primary end point was the skeletal morbidity period rate (SMPR), defined as the number of 12-week periods with new skeletal complications. Multivariate Poisson's regression analysis was used to assess the relative risk of skeletal-related events in each treatment group during the study period. Oral ibandronate 50 mg significantly reduced the mean SMPR compared with placebo (0.95 vs 1.18, P=0.004). There was a significant reduction in the mean number of events requiring radiotherapy (0.73 vs 0.98, P<0.001) and events requiring surgery (0.47 vs 0.53, P=0.037). Poisson's regression analysis confirmed that oral ibandronate significantly reduced the risk of a skeletal event compared with placebo (hazard ratio 0.62, 95% CI=0.48, 0.79; P=0.0001). The incidence of mild treatment-related upper GI AEs was slightly higher in the oral ibandronate 50 mg group compared with placebo, but very few serious drug-related AEs were reported. Oral ibandronate 50 mg is an effective, well-tolerated and convenient treatment for the prevention of skeletal complications of metastatic bone disease.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2409647PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601663DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

oral ibandronate
16
breast cancer
12
phase iii
12
skeletal complications
8
metastatic bone
8
bone disease
8
iii studies
8
oral bisphosphonate
8
bone metastases
8
oral
6

Similar Publications

Context: Fragility fractures in young adults present significant clinical challenges due to the limited evidence on the effectiveness of bisphosphonates in preventing subsequent fractures.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of bisphosphonate therapy in reducing the fracture risk among premenopausal women with a history of osteoporotic fractures.

Design: A population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC) in South Korea, covering the years 2003 to 2014.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This study analyzed the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data to investigate the correlation between oral bisphosphonates (BPs) and oesophageal adverse events (AEs).

Methods: We systematically extracted data on adverse reactions to oral alendronate, risedronate, and ibandronate from the FAERS database, covering the period from the 2004 Q1 to the 2023 Q4. The role_code of AEs mainly includes primary suspect (PS), secondary suspect (SS), concomitant (C), and interaction (I).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The aim of the authors was to evaluate the periapical and endodontic conditions of patients with osteoporosis and compare them with those of age- and sex-matched controls. The association between bisphosphonate (BiP) use and periapical and endodontic status in patients with osteoporosis was also investigated.

Methods: Panoramic radiographs of 711 patients with osteoporosis and 711 age- and sex-matched healthy patients were examined.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Bisphosphonates (BPs) are widely used for osteoporosis and cancer-induced bone diseases due to their antiresorptive properties, yet they pose risks such as medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ).

Methods: We present a unique case of concurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and MRONJ in a 72-year-old female chronically treated with oral ibandronate for osteoporosis. Following a dental extraction, she developed a nonhealing wound in the maxilla.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A cross-sectional study investigated the impact of Ibandronic acid on quality of life in patients with diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis, focusing on 34 subjective health parameters.
  • 15 patients completed standardized questionnaires before and two weeks after receiving 6mg of Ibandronic acid, reporting various improvements.
  • All patients noted significant enhancements in quality of life, including better oral health, reduced pain, improved fatigue and emotional functioning, as well as fewer speech and swallowing issues.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!