Background: The diagnosis of pulmonary embolism is difficult because the clinical diagnosis is nonspecific and all of the objective tests have limitations. The assay for plasma d-dimer may be useful as an exclusion test if results are negative. We conducted a prospective cohort study that evaluated the clinical utility (usefulness) of an automated quantitative d-dimer test in the diagnosis of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

Methods: Consecutive eligible patients who had clinically suspected PE with nondiagnostic lung scans or negative helical CT scan of the chest results underwent d-dimer testing.

Results: The d-dimer results were negative in 11 of 103 inpatients (10.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.5 to 18.3%) and 7 of 22 outpatients (31.8%, 95% CI, 13.9 to 54.9%; p = 0.02).

Conclusions: Measurement of plasma d-dimer is of limited clinical utility for inpatients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism and nondiagnostic lung scans or negative helical CT results at a US academic health center.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1215466PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.125.3.851DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical utility
12
suspected pulmonary
12
pulmonary embolism
12
nondiagnostic lung
12
lung scans
12
scans negative
12
patients suspected
8
embolism nondiagnostic
8
plasma d-dimer
8
clinically suspected
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!