We investigated the interaction between auditory and visual stimulus relating to the vowel sounds in the auditory cortex in humans, using magnetoencephalography. We compared the difference in the main component, M100 generated in the auditory cortex, in terms of peak latency, amplitude, dipole location and moment, following the vowel sound_/a/_between two conditions: (1) showing a face with closed mouth; and (2) showing the same face with mouth movement appearing to pronounce/a/using an apparent motion method. We found no significant difference in the M100 component between the two conditions within or between the right and left hemispheres. These findings indicated that the vowel sound perception in the auditory cortex, at least in the primary processing stage, was not affected by viewing mouth movement.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2003.12.082 | DOI Listing |
Background And Hypothesis: We have reported previously a reduction in superior temporal gyrus (STG) activation and in auditory verbal hallucinations (AHs) after real-time fMRI neurofeedback (NFB) in schizophrenia patients with AHs.
Study Design: With this randomized, participant-blinded, sham-controlled trial, we expanded our previous results. Specifically, we examined neurofeedback effects from the STG, an area associated with auditory hallucinations.
Imaging Neurosci (Camb)
April 2024
Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Listeners with hearing loss have trouble following a conversation in multitalker environments. While modern hearing aids can generally amplify speech, these devices are unable to tune into a target speaker without first knowing to which speaker a user aims to attend. Brain-controlled hearing aids have been proposed using auditory attention decoding (AAD) methods, but current methods use the same model to compare the speech stimulus and neural response, regardless of the dynamic overlap between talkers which is known to influence neural encoding.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCereb Cortex
January 2025
Optical Imaging and Brain Sciences Medical Discovery Team, Department of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, 2021 6th St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.
Processing sensory information, generating perceptions, and shaping behavior engages neural networks in brain areas with highly varied representations, ranging from unimodal sensory cortices to higher-order association areas. In early development, these areas share a common distributed and modular functional organization, but it is not known whether this undergoes a common developmental trajectory, or whether such organization persists only in some brain areas. Here, we examine the development of network organization across diverse cortical regions in ferrets using in vivo wide field calcium imaging of spontaneous activity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Prev Alzheimers Dis
February 2025
Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.
Background: Recent disease-modifying treatments for Alzheimer's disease show promise to slow cognitive decline, but show no efficacy towards reducing symptoms already manifested.
Objectives: To investigate the efficacy of a novel noninvasive brain stimulation technique in modulating cognitive functioning in Alzheimer's dementia (AD).
Design: Pilot, randomized, double-blind, parallel, sham-controlled study SETTING: Clinical research site at UT Southwestern Medical Center PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-five participants with clinical diagnoses of AD were enrolled from cognition specialty clinics.
Prog Neurobiol
January 2025
Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50, 4056 Basel, Switzerland. Electronic address:
The brain faces the challenging task of preserving a consistent portrayal of the external world in the face of disruptive sensory inputs. What alterations occur in sensory representation amidst noise, and how does brain activity adapt to it? Although it has previously been shown that background white noise (WN) decreases responses to salient sounds, a mechanistic understanding of the brain processes responsible for such changes is lacking. We investigated the effect of background WN on neuronal spiking activity, membrane potential, and network oscillations in the mouse central auditory system.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!