Clinical comparison of an adhesive precoated vs. an uncoated ceramic bracket system.

Orthod Craniofac Res

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Published: February 2004

Objectives: To clinically evaluate the bond characteristics of the adhesive precoated ceramic (APC) Clarity bracket and compare it with the uncoated Clarity bracket used with Transbond XT bonding system. Design - A randomized clinical trial. SETTINGS AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Department of Orthodontics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. Twenty patients requiring bonded fixed orthodontic appliance from central incisor to second bicuspid.

Experimental Variable: APC Clarity brackets were bonded in the first and fourth quadrant of group 1 and in the second and third quadrant of group 2. Uncoated Clarity brackets were bonded with Transbond XT in the second and third quadrant of group 1 and in the first and fourth quadrant of group 2.

Outcome Measure: During orthodontic treatment, bracket failures were registered. At debonding, the tooth surfaces were intraorally scored according to the Adhesive Remnant Index.

Results: During treatment one tie wing fractured in the APC group and no bond failures occurred. At debonding, no significant differences between the APC and Transbond XT could be shown in any of the quadrants.

Conclusion: The two groups performed identically.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2004.0276n.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

quadrant group
16
adhesive precoated
8
apc clarity
8
clarity bracket
8
uncoated clarity
8
clarity brackets
8
brackets bonded
8
fourth quadrant
8
second third
8
third quadrant
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!