A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[A comparison of three cephalometric analysis on the evaluation of orthodontic treatment]. | LitMetric

[A comparison of three cephalometric analysis on the evaluation of orthodontic treatment].

Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue

Department of Orthodontics, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Second Medical University, Shanghai 200011, China.

Published: June 2002

Objective: To analyze the reliability of different cephalometric superimposition methods for evaluation of orthodontic treatment.

Methods: The material consisted of fourteen pairs of cephalograms obtained before and after Herbst treatment. Each pair of the cephalograms were traced, superimposed by means of the three different superimposition methods three times each. A reference grid was used to quantitatively evaluate the sagittal dental and skeletal changes.

Results: (1) There was no statistically significant difference between the repeated measurements in the three methods respectively, i.e. all the three methods were reliable. (2) There was no significant difference among the three superimposition methods to evaluate the sagittal skeletal and dental changes. (3) Comparing the coefficient of reliability, none of the three methods was suitable for the individual assessment, and Pancherz' method only was acceptable for assessment of patients in groups.

Conclusion: The three methods have their own characteristic. The Pancherz's method is comparatively direct and effective on quantitative evaluation of orthodontic treatment.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

three methods
16
evaluation orthodontic
12
superimposition methods
12
three superimposition
8
methods three
8
evaluate sagittal
8
methods
7
three
7
comparison three
4
three cephalometric
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!