Objective: The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of opinion leaders in raising breast-feeding rates.

Study Design: A randomized controlled trial of an opinion leader strategy in 18 hospitals in Central New York State compared mothers' intention to breast-feed during baseline and study years. Multivariate logistic regression with a mixed model analyzed the effects on breast-feeding exclusively and on breast- and formula-feeding combined.

Results: Obstetric clinicians had a high degree of knowledge about breast-feeding benefits and of perceived responsibility to recommend breast-feeding. Obstetricians, family practitioners, and midwives agreed on the person identified as the opinion leader, in each case an obstetrician who was chief of obstetrics or obstetrics-gynecology. Breast-feeding rates in hospitals with the opinion leader intervention did not differ significantly from those in control-group hospitals during the study year.

Conclusion: The opinion leader strategy in this case did not improve breast-feeding rates during the study year. Opinion leader strategies may make assumptions about clinician control that are not justified in situations such as breast-feeding.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2003.09.014DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

opinion leader
24
leader strategy
12
breast-feeding rates
12
breast-feeding
8
improve breast-feeding
8
opinion
7
leader
6
implementing evidence-based
4
evidence-based practice
4
practice evaluation
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!