"The whole truth" versus "the admissible truth": an ethics dilemma for expert witnesses.

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law

Program in Psychiatry and the Law, Massachusetts Mental Health Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Published: July 2004

The expert witness testifies under oath to tell "the whole truth," yet certain aspects of the legal system itself make this ideal difficult or impossible. The authors present both a philosophical and a practical discussion of the challenges for the expert in attaining this goal. After review of oaths in general and truth-telling in particular, real-life examples are provided to examine the vicissitudes of the whole truth in court. Recommendations are provided for experts, to preserve the truth in the adversary system.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

"the truth"
8
truth" versus
4
versus "the
4
"the admissible
4
admissible truth"
4
truth" ethics
4
ethics dilemma
4
dilemma expert
4
expert witnesses
4
witnesses expert
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!