Purpose: To determine whether patients can guess their intraocular pressure (IOP).
Design: Patient survey.
Methods: We asked consecutive patients to guess their IOP and then indicate the IOP and the symptoms that allowed them to guess.
Results: Of 132 patients, 22 (17%) believed they could guess their IOP, usually based on a periocular symptom (n = 20, 91%). Nine of these patients (45%) correctly identified whether they were below or above the pressure indicated by the symptom. In two patients who required no symptoms to guess and in nine whose IOP was above their symptom threshold, the mean difference of the guessed IOP from the actual IOP did not differ (+/- 3.3 mm Hg) from that of control patients (+/- 2.1 mm Hg, n = 50; r =.19).
Conclusions: Patients who believe they can guess their IOP appear as often inaccurate as accurate in assessing their IOP related to a symptom threshold and as accurate as patients who claim they cannot guess their IOP.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(03)00861-4 | DOI Listing |
J Ophthalmic Vis Res
October 2020
Glaucoma Research Center, Montchoisi Clinic, Swiss Visio, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Glaucoma management has changed dramatically over the last decades, through clinical advances and technological revolutions. This review discusses the latest innovations and challenges faced in the field around three major axes: minimally-invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS), implantable sensors and injectable therapeutics. Indeed, the vast number of recently developed MIGS techniques has not only provided clinicians with a wide range of therapeutic options, but they have also enabled them to adjust their therapies more finely which may have contributed a more patient-centric decision-making process.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Ophthalmol
February 2004
Pharmaceutical Research Network, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina 29412-2464, USA.
Purpose: To determine whether patients can guess their intraocular pressure (IOP).
Design: Patient survey.
Methods: We asked consecutive patients to guess their IOP and then indicate the IOP and the symptoms that allowed them to guess.
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers
September 1998
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle 98195-6485, USA.
Background And Objective: Previous studies investigating the accuracy of digital palpation through the eyelids to estimate intraocular pressure (IOP) have shown disappointing results. In this study, the accuracy of digital assessment of IOP by palpation of the bare cornea is investigated.
Materials And Methods: The IOP of a cadaveric eye model was varied from 5 to 40 mm Hg in increments of 5 mm Hg.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!