AI Article Synopsis

  • The study focused on the effects of elevated CO(2) levels on root growth and ammonium uptake in loblolly and ponderosa pine seedlings.
  • The findings revealed that while higher CO(2) reduced the maximum uptake capacity of excised roots, it did not affect the uptake rates in intact root systems.
  • Ultimately, the increase in total ammonium uptake per plant at elevated CO(2) was attributed to a greater surface area in fine roots, particularly noted in ponderosa pine compared to loblolly pine.

Article Abstract

We examined changes in root growth and (15)NH(4) (+) uptake capacity of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) and ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa Douglas. Ex Laws.) seedlings that were grown in pots in a phytotron at CO(2) partial pressures of 35 or 70 Pa with NH(4) (+) as the sole N source. Kinetics of (15)N-labeled NH(4) (+) uptake were determined in excised roots, whereas total NH(4) (+) uptake and uptake rates were determined in intact root systems following a 48-h labeling of intact seedlings with (15)N. In both species, the elevated CO(2) treatment caused a significant downregulation of (15)NH(4) (+) uptake capacity in excised roots as a result of a severe inhibition of the maximum rate of root (15)NH(4) (+) uptake (V(max)). Rates of (15)NH(4) (+) uptake in intact roots were, however, unaffected by CO(2) treatment and were on average 4- to 10-fold less than the V(max) in excised roots, suggesting that (15)NH(4) (+) absorption from the soil was not limited by the kinetics of root (15)NH(4) (+) uptake. Despite the lack of a CO(2) effect on intact root absorption rates, (15)NH(4) (+) uptake on a per plant basis was enhanced at high CO(2) concentrations in both species, with the relative increase being markedly higher in ponderosa pine than in loblolly pine. High CO(2) concentration increased total (15)NH(4) (+) uptake and the fraction of total biomass allocated to fine roots (< 2 mm in diameter) to a similar relative extent. We suggest that the increased uptake on a per plant basis in response to CO(2) enrichment is largely the result of a compensatory increase in root absorbing surfaces.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/treephys/16.11-12.957DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

15nh4 uptake
32
root 15nh4
12
uptake
12
loblolly pine
12
ponderosa pine
12
excised roots
12
15nh4
9
co2 enrichment
8
uptake capacity
8
pine pinus
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!