[Percutaneous cementing techniques of the spine -- chances and limits].

Orthopade

Klinik für Unfallchirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover.

Published: January 2004

Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty represent minimal-invasive techniques for cement augmentation of vertebral bodies. Both procedures are successfully used for pain-relieving stabilizations of osteoporotic fractures or malignant processes. Advantages of kyphoplasty over vertebroplasty are to be seen in the possibility of deformity correction as well as in a decreased risk of cement extrusions which represent the most important potential for clinical complications. Long-term experiences with the effect of cementing are sparse. Thus it seems even more important, to judge indications and possibilities realistically. The decision whether and when to perform an augmentation is influenced by multiple factors. These include age of the patient, age of the fracture, degree of deformation and further degenerative changes of the spine. This article summarizes the present research and literature und is thought to provide guidelines for the aforementioned decision making processes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00132-003-0576-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

[percutaneous cementing
4
cementing techniques
4
techniques spine
4
spine chances
4
chances limits]
4
limits] vertebroplasty
4
vertebroplasty kyphoplasty
4
kyphoplasty represent
4
represent minimal-invasive
4
minimal-invasive techniques
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!