This study used comparison with videofluoroscopic examination of swallowing (VFES) to examine the validity of a 100-ml water swallowing test (WST) in assessing swallowing dysfunction. Fifty-nine consecutive outpatients (15 females, 44 males) with clinically suspected dysphagia were enrolled in this study. Each subject underwent a 100-ml WST followed by VFES. Data was obtained on swallowing speed and signs of choking (coughing and a wet-hoarse voice). The analytical results revealed that 49 subjects had abnormal swallowing speeds (< 10 ml/s) in the 100-ml WST, and 47 of them were identified as having dysphagia by VFES. Among the ten participants with normal swallowing speed (> 10 ml/s), eight were diagnosed with dysphagia by VFES. Notably, 14 participants choked in the 100-ml WST, 11 of whom exhibited aspiration or penetration in VFES. Among the 45 participants without choking in WST, 12 displayed aspiration or penetration in VFES. The sensitivity of swallowing speed in detecting the swallowing dysfunction was 85.5%, and the specificity was 50%. Moreover, the sensitivity of using choking or wet-horse voice in the 100-ml WST as the sole factor for predicting the presence of aspiration was 47.8%, while the specificity was 91.7%. Therefore, this study concluded that swallowing speed is a sensitive indicator for identifying patients at risk for swallowing dysfunction. Moreover, choking in the 100-ml WST may be a potential specific indicator for followup aspiration.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00455-003-0030-x | DOI Listing |
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol
December 2024
Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK.
Head Neck
December 2024
Institute of Population Health/Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Objectives: Swallowing function in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) is often assessed pre-treatment, during and at intervals post-treatment to identify those with dysphagia as early as possible. This study aims to investigate the minimal clinical important difference (MCID) for the 100 mL water swallow test (100 mL WST) to increase its utility in clinical practice and in clinical trials.
Methods: Data from 211 HNC patients, treated by either single or combined modality were included.
Australas J Ageing
June 2024
Department of Nursing, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Objective: The development of a dysphagia screening test is an urgent issue in the field of frailty prevention among community-dwelling older people. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the screening performance of a 100-mL water swallowing test (WST).
Methods: The study employed a cross-sectional design.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev
November 2023
Toxicology and Experimental Medicine Division, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
Objective: Dosimetric sparing of critical swallowing structures like constrictor muscles and larynx can lead to improved functional outcomes in head and neck cancer patients treated by chemoradiation.
Methods: A total of 50 Patients with newly diagnosed, biopsy proven AJCC stage II-IV head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCC) were prospectively studied. 25 patients were randomized in each arm of Dysphagia-optimized Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (Do-IMRT) arm and Standard Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (SIMRT) arm.
Head Neck
December 2022
School of Health Sciences, Institute of Population Health/Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Background: The 100 ml water swallow test (WST) is a validated swallow assessment used in head and neck cancer (HNC). We aimed to determine the level of agreement when completing the 100 ml WST via clinician-graded video-testing or patient self-testing compared to standard face-to-face assessment (FTF).
Methods: Convenience sampling from four UK centers.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!