The physician's office: can it influence adult immunization rates?

Am J Manag Care

Department of Family Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.

Published: January 2004

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to identify which factors in medical offices and among patients influence the rates of influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations in adults.
  • It involved interviewing patients and surveying office managers across 22 various practices, examining data through statistical analyses.
  • The findings highlighted that while patient factors significantly impact vaccination rates, practices that provide longer visit times and engage in more promotional activities tend to achieve higher vaccination rates overall.

Article Abstract

Objective: To determine which office and patient factors affect adult influenza and pneumococcal vaccination rates.

Study Design: Patient interviews and self-administered surveys of office managers.

Patients And Methods: In a 2-stage random cluster sample, 22 practices in 4 strata (Veterans' Affairs, rural, urban/suburban, and inner city) and 15 patients per physician in each practice (n = 946) were selected. Office managers completed a questionnaire regarding office practices and logistics affecting immunizations. Data were examined using chi2 and regression analyses without and with patient factors in the models.

Results: Practice factors significantly related to influenza vaccination status were stratum (VA OR = 2.04; 95% CI = 1.18, 3.53; P < .05 vs inner-city), time allotted for acute care visits (16-20 min vs 10-15 min OR = 2.49; 95% CI = 1.68, 3.09; P < .001), the practice not having a source of free vaccines (OR = .43; 95% CI = .3, .62; P < .001), and the interaction between being an urban/suburban practice and having a source of free flu vaccines (OR = 4.0; 95% CI = 2.63, 6.09; P < .001). Practice factors related to pneumococcal vaccination status were the number of immunization promotion activities (> or = 3 vs 0-2 OR = 1.97; 95% CI = 1.33, 2.94; P = .002) and the time allotted for acute care visits (16-20 min vs 10-15 min OR = 1.94; 95% CI = 1.18, 3.19; P = .011). When practice and patient factors were combined in the analyses, patient factors were more important.

Conclusion: Although patient factors are more important than practice factors, practices that allot more time for acute care visits and use more immunization promotion activities have higher vaccination rates.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patient factors
20
practice factors
12
acute care
12
care visits
12
factors
8
pneumococcal vaccination
8
analyses patient
8
vaccination status
8
95% 118
8
time allotted
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!