Objectives: To validate the test of memory malingering (TOMM), and to study the influence of intelligence and memory on its performance in brain injury patients.

Patients And Methods: A total of 30 patients with traumatic head injury were included in the study. All patients were assessed with the Complutense verbal learning test, the Visual Reproduction subtest of the Wechsler memory scale-revised, the Boston naming test, two fluency tests (FAS, and animals), the Wechsler adult intelligence test-III, and with the TOMM. Cognitive results below 1 standard deviation (SD) from normative data were considered 'abnormal'. A parametric correlation between TOMM scores and cognitive tests was used to detect whether memory and intelligence were affecting TOMM performance. Statistical significance was set up at p<0.05.

Results: Between 46.1% (Boston) and 81.4% (WAIS-III performance IQ) of the sample presented cognitive deficits. Up to 83.3% of the patients scored above the cutoff point suggestive of malingering in the TOMM (45/50). Significance correlations were found between TOMM scores and memory or intelligence indexes.

Discussion: The TOMM is a useful tool to detect malingering in head injured patients. Effects of low intelligence coefficients, as well as memory deficits should be considered in clinical practice when evaluating patients with TOMM scores suggestive of malingering.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

memory malingering
8
[intelligence memory
4
malingering correlation
4
correlation scales]
4
scales] objectives
4
objectives validate
4
validate test
4
memory
4
test memory
4
tomm
4

Similar Publications

This study addresses the relationship between performance validity and treatment outcome in a sample of patients with somatic symptom and related disorders (SSRD). A retrospective analysis was performed in a sample of 337 patients with SSRD who received treatment. Interaction effects were determined between performance validity test (PVT) performance and raw change scores, reliable change index and clinical change of depression, anxiety and physical symptoms.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Professional bodies recommend the use of performance validity tests (PVTs) to aid the interpretation of scores obtained in neuropsychological assessments, but base rates of failure differ according to neurological diagnosis and the associated impairments. This review summarises the PVT literature in people with epilepsy with the aim of establishing base rates of PVT failure and the factors associated with PVT performance in this population.

Methods: Ovid and PubMed databases were searched for studies reporting PVT test performance in people with epilepsy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Performance validity (PV) and symptom validity (SV) tests assess biased responding that impact scores on neuropsychological tests. The extent to which PV and SV represent overlapping or unique constructs remains incompletely defined, especially among psychiatric patients in a non-forensic setting. The current study investigated this question using confirmatory factor analysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study assessed the effectiveness of the TOMM 2 test among Spanish-speaking adults in Spain, involving 203 cognitively healthy participants.
  • All participants scored within the acceptable range when using the original TOMM cutoff scores, with only one individual potentially misclassified as having invalid performance under a lower threshold.
  • Results showed that Spanish adults performed better on Trial 1 than their English-speaking counterparts, indicating that the TOMM 2 maintains a high level of performance validity and specificity for this demographic.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates how healthy individuals and patients with Multiple Sclerosis respond to a computerized memory test under different conditions, comparing standard instructions to those feigning memory impairment.
  • Findings reveal that participants feigning impairment showed different eye-fixation patterns and response times, indicating they preferred new stimuli over familiar ones.
  • The research suggests that tracking eye movements can help identify exaggerated claims of cognitive dysfunction, though this method may not be as effective with clinical populations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!