Most hypertensive patients require more than one medication to effectively control elevated blood pressure (BP) values. This multicenter, randomized, double-blind study was aimed at testing the efficacy and safety of the combination of low-dose nifedipine GITS 20 mg/ losartan 50 mg compared with either monotherapy in patients with grade 1 to 3 hypertension over an eight-week period. Of 352 patients enrolled in the study, 300 were randomized. All the three treatments lowered elevated BP without clinically relevant changes in heart rate. All the three treatments lowered mean 24-hour diastolic BP: nifedipine GITS/losartan -10.6 mm Hg, losartan -5.4 mm Hg, nifedipine GITS 20 mg -8.0 mm Hg. There was a statistically significant difference of diastolic BP change between patients receiving losartan compared with those receiving combination treatment (P < 0.05). Diastolic BP trough-to-peak ratio and smoothness index were highest in the patient group receiving combination therapy (70%). Nifedipine GITS monotherapy had the highest systolic BP trough-to-peak ratio of all treatment arms (78%) and higher diastolic BP trough-to-peak ratio and smoothness index than losartan monotherapy. All treatments were safe. These data provide evidence that in hypertensive patients combination of nifedipine GITS 20 mg and losartan 50 mg improves control of systolic and diastolic BP compared with either monotherapy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005344-200402000-00021DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nifedipine gits
20
trough-to-peak ratio
12
combination low-dose
8
low-dose nifedipine
8
gits losartan
8
hypertensive patients
8
losartan compared
8
compared monotherapy
8
three treatments
8
treatments lowered
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • - The study examined how effective and safe nifedipine GITS and ramipril are for treating hypertension in Chinese versus European patients through a post-hoc analysis of a multinational trial.
  • - The research found that while both medications reduced blood pressure similarly across ethnic groups, ethnic differences impacted age, body mass index, and certain blood pressure measurements, and the response to treatment varied between the two groups.
  • - The safety profiles noted significant differences, with fewer adverse events in Chinese patients taking nifedipine, while Europeans experienced more ankle edema with nifedipine and dry cough with ramipril.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates how different methods of measuring blood pressure variability (OBP, HBP, and ABP) are related and agree with each other, particularly before and after starting treatment for high blood pressure.
  • Participants included untreated hypertensive individuals who were given either ramipril or nifedipine GITS for 10 weeks, with their blood pressure variability assessed using standard deviation and coefficient of variation.
  • Results showed only weak-to-moderate correlations between home and ambulatory BP measurements, indicating that while they can identify individuals with high blood pressure variability, they do not align well with office measurements.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: We investigated seasonal variation in ambulatory blood pressure control in hypertensive patients on clinic blood pressure-guided antihypertensive treatment.

Methods: The study participants were hypertensive patients enrolled in an 8-week therapeutic study. Antihypertensive treatment was initiated with long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers amlodipine 5 mg/day or the gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) formulation of nifedipine 30 mg/day, with the possible up-titration to amlodipine 10 mg/day or nifedipine-GITS 60 mg/day at 4 weeks of follow-up.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Non-dipper hypertension is often characterized by a blunted decrease of nocturnal blood pressure (BP) and is associated with increased risk of target organ damage and cardiovascular (CV) events, while the optimal treatment strategy is yet to be established. This trial was designed to evaluate whether nocturnal BP reduction and arterial stiffness improvement differ from antihypertensive agents and time of administration. Young and middle-aged adults (18-65 years) with non-dipper hypertension were randomly assigned to nifedipine GITS (gastrointestinal therapeutic system) 30 mg or amlodipine besylate 5 mg once daily for 8 weeks, either taken in the morning or at night.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Serum uric acid change in relation to antihypertensive therapy with the dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers.

Blood Press

December 2021

Centre for Epidemiological Studies and Clinical Trials, The Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Purpose: We investigated serum uric acid changes in relation to the achieved clinic and ambulatory blood pressure after 8 weeks of antihypertensive therapy with two dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers.

Materials And Methods: The study participants were patients with clinic and ambulatory hypertension, enrolled in a randomised controlled trial that compared amlodipine (5-10 mg,  = 215) and nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS, 30-60 mg,  = 203). Hyperuricaemia was defined as a serum uric acid concentration of ≥420 µmol/L in men and ≥360 µmol/L in women.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!