Background: Insertion of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) is a commonly performed procedure in both preterm and term infants. Tetracaine 4% gel (Ametop; Smith & Nephew Inc, St. Laurent, Quebec), a topical anesthetic, although reported to be effective for reducing the pain of venipuncture in neonates, has not been investigated for the management of pain associated with the PICC procedure.

Purpose: To determine the efficacy of tetracaine gel for managing the pain associated with the PICC procedure in preterm and term infants.

Methods: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trial (RCT) design was used. Infants undergoing nonurgent PICC insertion were randomized to receive either the treatment (1.0 g of tetracaine 4% gel) or placebo control (1.0 g of eucerin-plus cream) applied to the skin under occlusion for 30 minutes before the procedure. Data on the behavioral (facial expression) and physiologic (heart rate and oxygen saturation) indicators of pain were collected via videotaping and computer monitoring throughout the procedure. Data then were coded and measured by independent observers using the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP; Stevens et al, 1996), and analyzed using descriptive statistics and repeated-measures analyses of variance.

Results: Forty-nine infants, gestational age 27 to 41 weeks (mean = 33; SD = 4.2) and age at time of insertion 2 to 85 days (mean = 18; SD = 22.5) participated. No differences were found between the groups at the time of randomization. There were no adverse cardiorespiratory events or local skin reactions in either group. There was a significant within-subjects main effect of time across the procedure (F[48,3] = 11.03; P < 0.0001). There was no significant between-subjects main effect of group (F[48,1] = 0.11; P = 0.74) and no (group x time) interaction (F[48,3] = 0.45; P = 0.72).

Conclusion: Tetracaine gel was not effective for pain relief for PICC insertion in infants. Its use for pain relief cannot be recommended based on the results of this study. Other pharmacologic, behavioral, and physical interventions should be investigated for safety and relief of procedural pain in this population of infants.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adnc.2003.09.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tetracaine gel
20
pain relief
12
pain
9
randomized controlled
8
controlled trial
8
efficacy tetracaine
8
peripherally inserted
8
inserted central
8
central catheters
8
procedure preterm
8

Similar Publications

Background: The injection of local anesthetics, an extremely painful procedure, leads to a reduction of patients' acceptance.

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and adverse reactions of 4% tetracaine gel (TG) and lidocaine-prilocaine cream (LPC) on reducing the local anesthetic injection pain for upper eyelid blepharoplasty.

Methods: Sixty participants were equally divided into three groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: skin lacerations are one of the main causes of children's referral to the emergency department (ED). We introduced in our general ED a pediatric sedo-analgesia protocol (SAP) for suturing skin wounds using LAT gel, a local anesthetic solution of lidocaine, adrenaline and tetracaine, with or without low-dose oral midazolam according to patient's age, to improve the experience of laceration repair.

Methods: Primary outcomes were improvement of suturing experience for ED operators (as a reduction in the desire to avoid the procedure) and of the adequacy of sedo-analgesia provided, investigated through two different surveys administered to the ED staff before and after the introduction of the SAP.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To evaluate if chloroprocaine ophthalmic gel 3% acts as a barrier to the bactericidal actions of povidone-iodine (PVI) which has been seen in other higher viscosity gel anesthetics.

Methods: This was a single site, prospective, randomized, patient-masked study evaluating the effects of preservative-free chloroprocaine ophthalmic gel 3% (IHEEZO, Harrow, Nashville, TN) compared with tetracaine ophthalmic solution 0.5% and their effects on the bactericidal action of povidone-iodine 5%.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To compare the efficacy and safety of a novel ophthalmic anesthetic, chloroprocaine 3% gel to tetracaine 0.5% eye drops in patients undergoing cataract surgery with phacoemulsification. This was a prospective, randomized, multicenter, active-controlled, masked-observer, parallel group competitive equivalence study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!