AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compares platelet activation levels in donor apheresis using two different devices: Trima and Spectra, focusing on plasma-reduced plateletpheresis.
  • Results indicated that platelet collections from Trima had reduced aggregation response and lower P-selectin release post-stimulation, whereas differences vanished with traditional nonplasma-reduced procedures.
  • The findings suggest multicomponent collection may lead to increased platelet activation, highlighting the need for further clinical studies to determine the implications of this on donor health and product efficacy.

Article Abstract

Background: The wide diffusion of multicomponent collection in donor apheresis has led to the yielding of different components, such as plasma-reduced platelet-pheresis at high PLT concentration. We investigated whether this collection modality could induce more PLT activation compared to standard plateletpheresis.

Study Design And Methods: Forty-one plateletpheresis collections (20 Trima and 21 Spectra LRS Turbo v.7.0, COBE) were evaluated. Donor, procedure, and product data were recorded. ADP, collagen, and U46619 (a thromboxane-A2 analog)-induced PLT aggregation was investigated in basal (donor) and final (plateletpheresis unit) samples. The expression of PLT activation marker P-selectin (CD62P) was studied using flow cytometry in basal and final samples. In all cases, P-selectin was investigated in final samples after stimulation with ADP to assess for a possible further release of the antigen. Four additional plateletpheresis procedures were performed in donors from Group A, using the traditional, nonplasma-reduced program.

Results: Plateletpheresis obtained by means of the Trima device showed a lower response to in-vitro induced PLT aggregation and a higher percentage of P-selectin-expressing PLT when compared to products obtained using the Spectra device. Moreover, P-selectin release after ADP stimulation was reduced in plateletpheresis units obtained using the Trima device. These differences disappeared when a nonplasma-reduced collection program was used. In-vivo evaluation did not detect any difference between plateletpheresis obtained by means of the two cell separators.

Conclusions: Plateletpheresis units obtained by means of multicomponent collection show a higher degree of PLT activation compared to traditional plateletpheresis procedures when high-concentration plasma-reduced products are collected. Randomized clinical studies are needed to assess the real impact of these findings in terms of in-vivo efficacy of plasma-reduced plateletpheresis units.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0041-1132.2004.00613.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

plt activation
12
plateletpheresis units
12
plateletpheresis
9
plt
8
trima spectra
8
spectra lrs
8
lrs turbo
8
multicomponent collection
8
activation compared
8
plt aggregation
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!