A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Current view and critic of alternatives to transurethral surgery of prostatic benign prostate]. | LitMetric

[Current view and critic of alternatives to transurethral surgery of prostatic benign prostate].

Arch Esp Urol

Fundación Puigvert, C/Cartagena 340-350 08025 Barcelona, España.

Published: November 2003

Objectives: Critical update of transurethral surgery options based on the last decade most relevant bibliography.

Methods: Comparative study between Incision/TUR of the prostate and alternative techniques, accordingly to data from 30 randomized studies and 28 clinical studies. We evaluate efficiency, retreatment index, morbidity, post operative number of days with catheter, anesthetic requirements, and cost. Data are expressed as percentages resulting from a differential formula in randomized studies and simple percentages or numeric expression for relevant clinical data.

Results: Efficiency: all alternative treatments show a symptomatic improvement (> 50%) similar to that achieved by transurethral surgery; post treatment flowmetry percentage increase is inferior in all alternatives except vaporization, holmium laser and prosthesis. Re-Treatment requirements: they were higher in all alternatives except the ablative ones (vaporization and holmium laser). Morbidity: all of them had an operative estimated blood loss inferior to TUR and similar to prostatic incision; contact laser and vaporization had more irritative symptoms than incision, and VLAP and TUMT more than TUR; TUMT and interstitial laser have a higher rate of post operative infection; all alternatives except the ablative ones had lower percentages of urethral stenosis and retrograde ejaculation. Number of days of catheter post operative: it was comparatively longer after vaporization and very long after VLAP, interstitial laser and TUMT. All treatments except TUNA and TUMT require the same anesthesia than transurethral surgery. The cost/benefit has not been sufficiently evaluated, but it is superior with holmium laser, contact laser and vaporization than with transurethral surgery.

Conclusions: Based on study data we can accept holmium laser as a real alternative, TUMT in cases when surgery is questioned and intraprostatic prosthesis when it is not possible.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

transurethral surgery
16
holmium laser
16
post operative
12
randomized studies
8
number days
8
days catheter
8
vaporization holmium
8
laser
8
alternatives ablative
8
contact laser
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!