AI Article Synopsis

  • The study focused on glioblastoma patients and assessed the effectiveness of aggressive second-line treatments during disease recurrence, aiming to enhance survival rates and quality of life.
  • Results showed that patients receiving specific reintervention strategies had significantly better median overall survival and progression-free survival rates compared to both the overall patient cohort and standard treatment groups.
  • The findings suggest that reintervention approaches, such as additional surgeries and targeted therapies, can improve outcomes for recurrent glioblastoma patients and enhance their quality of life.

Article Abstract

Background: Survival after first-line therapy is poor for patients with glioblastoma. The role of second-line treatment for recurrent disease is controversial. The authors studied the outcome in a subset of patients with glioblastoma who were selected for an aggressive reintervention strategy at the time of progression. Their objectives were to improve patients' overall survival with sustained quality of life and to make comparisons with overall survival in unselected patients.

Methods: Overall, 168 patients were eligible for retrospective analysis. Ninety patients received specific therapy for disease recurrence (reintervention group) by specific criteria.

Results: In the reintervention group, promising median overall survival (mOS) results after diagnosis (61.5 weeks) and progression (33 weeks) were obtained. The progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 12 months and the overall survival rate were superior in the reintervention group (71% at 12 months and 32% at 24 months) compared with the total cohort (45% and 20%, respectively) and the standard group (15% and 5%, respectively). A matched-pair analysis (n = 46 in each group), with an mOS period of 65.5 versus 28.5 weeks, confirmed these data. Quality of life was stable or slightly improved during reinterventions in a subset of patients treated within clinical studies.

Conclusions: The majority of patients in the current series were treated with a reintervention strategy, which had an impact on PFS and mOS. A second resection, focal radiotherapy (in selected cases), and additional chemotherapeutic regimens should be considered for patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11845DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients glioblastoma
12
reintervention group
12
patients
8
subset patients
8
reintervention strategy
8
quality life
8
survival
6
reintervention
5
group
5
salvage therapy
4

Similar Publications

Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain protein 1 (NOD1) is one of the innate immune receptors that has been associated with tumorigenesis and abnormally expressed in various cancers. However, the role of NOD1 in Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) has not been investigated. We used the Tumor Immune Estimate Resource (TIMER) database to compare the differential expression of NOD1 in various tumors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Glioblastoma: Clinical Presentation, Multidisciplinary Management, and Long-Term Outcomes.

Cancers (Basel)

January 2025

Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, 7621 Pécs, Hungary.

Glioblastoma, the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor in adults, presents a formidable challenge due to its rapid progression, treatment resistance, and poor survival outcomes. Standard care typically involves maximal safe surgical resection, followed by fractionated external beam radiation therapy and concurrent temozolomide chemotherapy. Despite these interventions, median survival remains approximately 12-15 months, with a five-year survival rate below 10%.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Glioblastoma is the most common primary brain tumor in adult patients, and despite standard-of-care treatment, median survival has remained less than two years. Advances in our understanding of molecular mutations have led to changes in the diagnostic criteria of glioblastoma, with the WHO classification integrating important mutations into the grading system in 2021. We sought to review the basics of the important genetic mutations associated with glioblastoma, including known mechanisms and roles in disease pathogenesis/treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: CSCs are critical drivers of the tumor and stem cell phenotypes of glioblastoma (GBM) cells. Chromatin modifications play a fundamental role in driving a GBM CSC phenotype. The goal of this study is to further our understanding of how stem cell-driving events control changes in chromatin architecture that contribute to the tumor-propagating phenotype of GBM.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background/objectives: In the REGOMA trial, regorafenib demonstrated an overall survival advantage over lomustine, and it has become a recommended treatment for recurrent glioblastoma in guidelines. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of regorafenib as a third-line treatment for patients with recurrent glioblastoma who progressed while taking bevacizumab-based therapy.

Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study in Turkey included 65 patients treated between 2021 and 2023 across 19 oncology centers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!