This study reports new electrocardiographic (ECG) predictors of radiofrequency catheter ablation failure and recurrence in idiopathic right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ectopy based on 91 consecutive patients. Procedural success and failure rates were 85% (77/91) and 15% (14/91), respectively. Twenty three percent (18/77) had recurrence during the follow-up period of 1 to 120 months (mean 56 +/- 31 months). Baseline RVOT VT/ectopy on 12-lead ECG taken prior to ablation from 91 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Ablation performed with RVOT ectopy (isolated ectopies, bigeminy, trigeminy, or couplets) as template arrhythmia was more likely to fail (30% vs. 8%, P =.02) as opposed to RVOT VT (sustained or nonsustained). VT/ectopy-QRS morphology variation was more observed in failed ablations (36% vs. 7%, P =.001). Significantly wider mean VT/ectopy QRS in leads I, II, AVR, V2, V3, V5, and V6 were noted in failed ablation group. Mean R wave amplitude reached statistical significance only in lead II (22.0 +/- 5.1 mV for failed vs. 17.8 +/- 5.2 mV for successful outcomes; P =.009). QRS morphologic variation (47% vs. 16%; P =.009) was the only statistically significant ECG to be more common in patients with arrhythmia recurrence. In conclusion, ablation with ectopy over VT as template arrhythmia, presence of QRS morphologic variation, wider mean QRS width, and taller mean R-wave amplitude in lead II were identified ECG predictors of failed RVOT VT/Ectopy ablation. The only ECG predictor of recurrence was the presence of RVOT VT or ectopy QRS morphologic variation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2003.08.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

qrs morphologic
12
morphologic variation
12
failure recurrence
8
idiopathic ventricular
8
ventricular outflow
8
outflow tract
8
tachycardia ectopy
8
radiofrequency catheter
8
catheter ablation
8
ecg predictors
8

Similar Publications

Electrophysiological characteristics of lead position-dependent electrogram uninterrupted transition during left bundle branch pacing.

Heart Rhythm

November 2024

Center for Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Epidemiology and Translational Medicine, Guoke Ningbo Life Science and Health Industry Research Institute, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.

Background: The interrupted technique of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) limits the continuous monitoring of paced electrocardiogram and intracardiac electrogram (EGM) transitions, which may result in overlooked or misinterpreted subtle transitions.

Objectives: This study aimed to explore the electrophysiological characteristics of lead position-dependent EGM continuous transitions to evaluate lead depth and to investigate the clinical significance of transseptal pacing modalities.

Methods: A continuous pacing and recording technique enabled by a rotatable connector was used to allow the real-time monitoring of progressive changes in paced EGM and electrocardiographic morphology.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: It remains unclear if pacing induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) may be minimized by standard pacing of the right ventricle (RV) at sites other than the RV apex. The purpose of this study is to compare the relative frequency of PICM in a population of patients paced at either the superficial RV mid septum (RVMS) or RV apex (RVA), and other outcomes that may differ between these sites.

Methods And Results: A retrospective evaluation was performed on all patients undergoing pacemaker implantation between 2011 and 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: Although left ventricular excessive trabeculation (LVET) can cause heart failure, arrhythmia and thromboembolism, limited literature is available on the ECG characteristics of primary LVET with preserved left ventricular function (EF). We aimed to compare the ECG characteristics and cardiac MR (CMR) parameters of LVET individuals with preserved left ventricular EF to a control (C) group, to identify sex-specific differences, and to compare the genetic subgroups of LVET with each other and with a C population. : In our study, we selected 69 LVET individuals (EF > 50%) without any comorbidities and compared them to 69 sex- and age-matched control subjects (42% females in both groups, = 1.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: To quantitatively analyse exercise-induced cardiac remodeling (EICR) data in female athletes.

Methods: This scoping review included from the databases Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar, peer-reviewed original English-language articles on female athlete-populations aged ≥18 years containing data on electrocardiography (ECG), echocardiography or cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and excluded athletes with cardiovascular conditions. From the extracted ECG data, we calculated prevalence percentages, and from the imaging data we compared the results with the upper reference limits of the general female population (URL).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Rate-Dependent Pacemap Matching in Scar-Related Ventricular Tachycardia: Impact of "TR Fusion" Phenomenon.

JACC Clin Electrophysiol

October 2024

University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Banner-University Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA; Center for Arrhythmia Care, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA. Electronic address:

Background: The impact of varying rates of pacemapping (PM) rates on QRS morphology and PM score matching in patients with scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) has not been systematically assessed.

Objectives: In this study, the authors sought to assess the variability in PM score matching at different pacing rates.

Methods: During substrate mapping for VT ablation, PM was performed at cycle lengths (CLs) of 600 ms, 500 ms, 400 ms, 300 ms, and VT CL.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!