Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Periodic follow-up is mandatory for patients with aortic stent-grafts. Central to surveillance is the establishment of a baseline against which changes can be detected. Computed tomography (CT) has been the benchmark of follow-up imaging for endografts, but comparison of serial AP and lateral plain radiographs will detect structural alterations that can be missed on CT scans. In this review, we illustrate these common endograft complications and the value of plain radiographs in their detection. We believe that the plain radiograph should be the cornerstone of aortic endograft surveillance. However, a standardized protocol should be used to avoid parallax and positioning errors that affect interpretation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/152660280301000508 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!