Curing, relieving and comforting are the central tasks of doctors. However, do we actually perform these tasks? A literature review was carried out to investigate how visits to general practitioners have been evaluated. The review indicates that evaluations have focused mostly on whether the patient was satisfied with the visit, on changes in the patient's health status, on whether the patient's health care consumption has decreased, on whether the patient has complied with advice and prescriptions, and to a lesser degree on enablement. These different measures have sometimes been related to the working methods of the doctor. In these often large, quantitative studies, there is a great deal of uncertainty concerning the definition of terms such as "satisfaction" and "health" and also concerning the sampling of doctors and patients. The information communicated by the studies seldom contributes to increased understanding of the importance of consultations to patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patient's health
8
[what benefits
4
benefits patient
4
patient gain
4
gain consulting
4
consulting general
4
general practitioner?
4
practitioner? review
4
review literature
4
literature impact
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!