Background: Athletes often employ prophylactic braces to reduce the risk of ankle injuries.
Hypothesis: Ankle braces do not significantly decrease the risk of forced inversion on a standardized one-footed jump landing.
Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.
Methods: Fourteen healthy men with a mean age of 25.1 years were tested. Three braces, two semirigid (Aircast and Bledsoe) and one lace-up (Swede-O), were fitted to each subject. Forced dynamic ankle inversion of 24 degrees was to be resisted as the subjects landed on one foot with a force of two body weights on a stimulus presented randomly in 5 of 15 jump trial blocks onto a hard, level force plate. Subjects first completed 1 no-brace block of 5 trials to establish baseline performance, then 3 randomly ordered 15-trial blocks testing performance with each of the braces, and then finally a no-brace 5-trial block.
Results: The average no-brace success rate was 24%, which demonstrated the challenging nature of the task. All three braces increased the success rate (average, 44%); however, only the two semirigid braces proved to be significantly better than the unbraced state.
Conclusion: This test holds promise for evaluating brace efficacy when landing with one foot unexpectedly on an object that acts to forcibly invert the ankle.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03635465030310063201 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!