A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Experimental evaluation of online optical coherence pachymetry for corneal refractive surgery. | LitMetric

Experimental evaluation of online optical coherence pachymetry for corneal refractive surgery.

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol

Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Rudower Strasse 48, 12351 Berlin, Germany.

Published: January 2004

Purpose: Online optical coherence pachymetry (OCP) allows to monitor central changes of the corneal cross section intraoperatively. In this experimental evaluation the validity of the optical measurements for corneal refractive surgery was assessed.

Methods: Online OCP based on low-coherence interferometry with a wavelength of 1310 nm and a measurement frequency of 74 Hz was directly integrated in a clinical excimer laser. In 16 patients the central corneal thickness was measured with online OCP and ultrasound pachymetry (US). Furthermore, the ablation characteristics were assessed in corneoscleral discs unsuitable for transplantation (n=12) and PMMA samples (n=18).

Results: Online OCP was possible in all patients and materials studied. The mean central corneal thickness was 537+/-31 microm (OCP) and 546+/-33 microm (US). The corneal reproducibility was +/-4.3 microm (coefficient of variation [CV] 0.8%) with online OCP and +/-3.7 microm (CV 0.68%) with US. The reproducibility in PMMA samples was +/-1.0 microm (CV 0.16%). There was a significant correlation between online OCP and US measurements (r=0.93, P<0.001). The mean difference was 9.1 microm or 1.69% (P=0.01), and the limits of agreement (95% CI) ranged from -15 microm to 33 microm. There was a significant linear relationship (r=0,95; P<0.001) between the calculated and the optically determined ablation depth with online OCP. Also ablation depth measurements in PMMA correlated positively with spectrophotometric values (r=0.98; P<0.001).

Conclusion: In this experimental evaluation, online OCP revealed to be a precise and reproducible method to assess the central corneal thickness and its changes intraoperatively. This could be important to monitor incisional and excimer laser-based corneal refractive procedures, such as PRK or LASIK.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-003-0700-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

online ocp
20
experimental evaluation
8
online optical
8
optical coherence
8
coherence pachymetry
8
corneal refractive
8
refractive surgery
8
central corneal
8
corneal thickness
8
pmma samples
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!