Objective: To compare the costs and outcome of high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy of the prostate (HE-TUMT) with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), as the former is considered to be the best minimally invasive method for managing lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
Patients And Methods: Between January 1996 and March 1997, 144 patients were randomized to treatment with HE-TUMT (78) using the Prostatron device and Prostasoft 2.5 software (EDAP Technomed, Lyon, France), or TURP (66). At baseline and during the annual follow-up, patients were evaluated by the International Prostate Symptom Score and uroflowmetry (maximum flow rate and postvoid residual volume). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to calculate the cumulative risk of re-treatment. A cost-consequences analysis was performed based on the prospective measurement of healthcare use, with costs expressed as Netherland guilders (NLG).
Results: During a 3-year follow-up period, the mean (95% confidence interval) risk of re-treatment was 22.9 (12.5-33.2)% and 13.2 (4.5-21.9)% for HE-TUMT and TURP, respectively (P = 0.215). The mean direct cost of treatment was 3450 (3444-3456) and 6560 (5992-7128) NLG for HE-TUMT and TURP, respectively. The mean total (including re-treatments), discounted (4%) 3-year cost for the HE-TUMT and TURP group was 5300 (4692-5908) and 7800 (7118-8482) NLG, respectively.
Conclusions: In this prospective randomized trial, HE-TUMT and TURP had a comparable 3-year risk of re-treatment. Healthcare expenditure on HE-TUMT, mainly because it is an outpatient treatment, was significantly lower than for TURP.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.2003.04470.x | DOI Listing |
Urologe A
February 2016
Klinik für Urologie, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Oberhausen, Oberhausen, Deutschland.
This report summarizes the relevant aspects of the S2e guideline of the German Urologists for the instrumental treatment of the lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Recommendations are given regarding open and transurethral procedures (TUR-P, bipolar TUR-P, TUI-P, HE-TUMT, TUNA, and the different Laser techniques). Recommendations are also given concerning intraprostatic stents and injection therapies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSurg Technol Int
May 2015
School of Public Health and Technomics Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Objectives: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) can cause lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Medications are first line treatment for mild-moderate BPH. Office-based minimally invasive therapies (MITs) are also acceptable early treatment options but comparisons of MIT to medications are limited.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFScand J Urol
August 2014
Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg , Sweden.
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate cell kill accuracy and responder rate when using injections of intraprostatic mepivacaine and adrenaline (MA) before high-energy microwave thermotherapy (HE-TUMT).
Material And Methods: This retrospective evaluation encompassed 283 treatments in men with lower urinary tract symptoms or urinary retention due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. They were treated consecutively during 2003-2008 using HE-TUMT with a feedback technique.
Arch Ital Urol Androl
June 2011
Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari, Italy.
Objectives: High-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy (HE-TUMT) has become one of the most preferred minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). In this study we report the long term results in a subset of patients treated with the 30-minute high energy protocol.
Patients And Methods: A total of 135 patients were treated with TUMT Prostasoft 3.
J Endourol
April 2008
Smith Institute for Urology, North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, New Hyde Park, New York 11040, USA.
Background And Purpose: Minimally invasive office-based treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are challenging the traditional surgical and medical management options for symptomatic BPH. We conducted a meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials that compared high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy (HE-TUMT) with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) to compare subjective and objective outcomes.
Materials And Methods: A literature search using Pub-Med was conducted to obtain all published data on HE-TUMT and all randomized controlled trials that compared HE-TUMT with TURP.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!