Cost and utilization comparisons among propensity score-matched insulin lispro and regular insulin users.

J Manag Care Pharm

Economic and Outcomes Division, Ingenix, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344, USA.

Published: December 2003

Objective: To compare cost and utilization among users of insulin lispro and regular (human) insulin.

Methods: This was a retrospective analysis using administrative claims data for continuously enrolled subjects using insulin lispro or regular insulin between January 1, 1998, and December 21, 1999. Subjects were matched 1 to 1 on the propensity to receive lispro versus regular insulin using a score estimated from baseline characteristics such as age, gender, comorbidities, and oral hypoglycemic use. Once matched, 12 months of follow-up pharmacy and medical cost and utilization data (e.g. prescriptions, office visits, hospitalizations) from July 1,1997, through December 31, 2000, were analyzed using univariate statistics.

Results: Of 11,443 subjects, 3,341 (29.2%) had received a prescription for insulin lispro, while 8,102 (70.8%) had received a prescription for regular insulin. At baseline, lispro subjects tended to be younger, more often had type 1 diabetes and a history of insulin use, had fewer comorbidities, visited endocrinologists more often than family practice physicians, and had lower total costs. After matching on propensity score to within +/-0.01, 1,832 subject pairs were retained. On average, lispro subjects had significantly more office visits (P=0.0022) and pharmacy prescriptions (P=0.0165) but fewer inpatient hospital visits (P=0.0028)compared to regular insulin subjects. Cost results were similar, with insulin lispro subjects having significantly higher average office visit costs (P=0.0237) and pharmacy costs (P<0.0001) but lower inpatient hospital costs (P=0.0227). Total costs were not significantly different between treatment groups (P=0.5266).

Conclusion: Total direct health care costs were not different between insulin lispro and regular insulin users. An association was observed between higher direct drug product cost and more intensive ambulatory care for insulin lispro users and lower inpatient hospital cost in the short-term.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10437302PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2003.9.3.263DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

insulin lispro
20
regular insulin
20
cost utilization
12
lispro regular
12
lispro subjects
12
insulin
11
lispro
8
office visits
8
received prescription
8
subjects
7

Similar Publications

Diabetes mellitus represents a significant and growing global health challenge, with its prevalence steadily increasing. Insulin therapy remains a cornerstone of diabetes management. Since its discovery in 1921, insulin has undergone substantial advancements, evolving from crude animal extracts to highly refined recombinant formulations and biosimilars.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[Tirzepatide : overview of clinical studies SURPASS in type 2 diabetes and SURMOUNT in obesity].

Rev Med Liege

December 2024

Service de Diabétologie, Nutrition et Maladies métaboliques, CHU Liège, Belgique.

Tirzepatide is a unimolecular dual agonist of both glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptors, which has been developed as once-weekly injection first for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2DM), then for the treatment of obesity. Because of the complementarity of action of the two incretins, tirzepatide showed, in a dose-dependent manner (5, 10 and 15 mg), a better efficacy (greater reduction in HbA1c and body weight) compared with placebo, semaglutide 1 mg, basal insulin and preprandial boluses of insulin lispro in six studies of the SURPASS programme. In the SURMOUNT programme, tirzepatide showed a marked reduction in body weight, never reached before with a drug, among people with obesity or overweight associated with complications linked to excess weight.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: When administered in early type 2 diabetes (T2DM), the strategy of 'induction' with short-term intensive insulin therapy (IIT) followed by 'maintenance' with metformin thereafter can yield outstanding glycaemic control, with some patients achieving A1c in the normal range of its assay. We thus sought to identify determinants of sustained normalisation of A1c in response to this treatment strategy.

Materials And Methods: In this study, adults with T2DM of mean duration 1.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: There is no information on the incidence of severe hypoglycemia in real-world patients with diabetes receiving ultra-rapid lispro (URLi). This post-marketing, observational, safety study assessed the incidence proportion and incidence rate of the first severe hypoglycemia event requiring a hospital visit in URLi-treated patients. It also compared the risk of severe hypoglycemia between patients treated with URLi or other rapid-acting insulin analogs (RAIAs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!