Background And Aim: This prospective cohort observational study, set in a district hospital, presents our experience (1976-1993) of duodenal ulcer refractory to histamine H2 receptor antagonists (defined as not healed after 3 months' treatment) and comments on onset, outcome and spontaneous decline.
Methods: Patients were treated mainly with cimetidine, the dose being titrated (up to 3.2 g daily) according to response, and followed by serial check endoscopy and clinical assessment.
Results: A total of 782 of the 4032 duodenal ulcer patients seen (19%) were refractory; the incidence declined over time: 1976-1978: 124/379 (33%); 1979-1983: 390/1240 (31%); 1984-1988: 190/1295 (15%); 1989-1993: 78/1118 (7%). A total of 344 were refractory for the first time on their first healing course and 174 on their second. Healing was achieved in two-thirds after a mean of 7 months' treatment with cimetidine 1 g; treatment for 12-18 months with higher doses was needed in the remainder. Relapse occurred in up to three-quarters of patients despite maintenance cimetidine up to 3 g daily. Eventually 47 patients were operated upon but good results (i.e., no ulcer, no symptoms) were achieved in only 11.
Conclusion: Refractoriness was common until recently. Its incidence has declined dramatically, the fall preceding the newer more powerful treatment with proton pump inhibitors and with Helicobacter pylori eradication. We suggest this phenomenon is a modern example of a spontaneous change in the natural history of the disease.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1590-8658(03)00269-x | DOI Listing |
Surg Pract Sci
June 2024
Division of Trauma Surgery, Department of Traumatology, University Hospital Zurich, University Zurich, Switzerland.
Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an acute virus infection, which was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. The Swiss government decreed a public lockdown to reduce and restrict further infections. The aim of this investigation was to analyze the impact of the first COVID-19 lockdown on the performance of general and visceral surgery procedures.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSurg Pract Sci
December 2024
Medical School, Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
Omental patch repair is a crucial surgical procedure for managing gastrointestinal perforations, particularly those associated with peptic ulcers, necessitating a detailed review of its effectiveness and outcomes. This literature review aims to assess current knowledge on omental patch repair, focusing on advancements in surgical techniques and patient outcomes. Major medical databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, were searched for relevant studies published between 2020 and 2024, prioritizing those that explored omental patch repair, surgical methods, and associated clinical outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr
January 2025
Department of Pediatrics, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
Purpose: is a Gram-negative bacterium that is associated with peptic ulcer disease (PUD) and gastric cancer. However, studies on the endoscopic finding and factors related to infection in children are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and factors associated with infection in children with dyspepsia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin J Gastroenterol
January 2025
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saitama Children's Medical Center, 1-2 Shintoshin, Chuo-ku, Saitama, 3308777, Japan.
Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs) are treated with corticosteroids and food allergen elimination. However, treatment for refractory cases is not standardized. We demonstrate the efficacy of vedolizumab, an anti-α4β7 integrin agent, in 2 children with duodenal ulcers developed by non-eosinophilic esophagitis EGIDs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
December 2024
Interventional Cardiology, Lee Health, Fort Myers, USA.
Managing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients with a recent history of gastrointestinal bleeding presents a unique and challenging clinical dilemma, necessitating a careful balance between minimizing ischemic risk and avoiding potentially life-threatening rebleeding. Standard treatment for ACS typically involves dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to prevent recurrent thrombotic events. However, in patients with recent gastrointestinal hemorrhage or significant anemia, these therapies may substantially increase the risk of life-threatening bleeding, complicating the decision-making process and often leading to conservative management strategies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!