A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Hemodynamic and blockade effects of high/low epinephrine doses during axillary brachial plexus blockade with lidocaine 1.5%: A randomized, double-blinded study. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compared the effects of two different doses of epinephrine on hemodynamics and anesthesia during axillary brachial plexus blockade using lidocaine.
  • In the trial involving 60 patients, those receiving 200 microg of epinephrine experienced longer motor block durations but also showed higher heart rates and blood pressure compared to the lower dose group.
  • The findings suggest that using a low-dose epinephrine (25 microg) may provide more stable hemodynamics while achieving similar anesthesia outcomes, making it a better option for patients prone to cardiovascular issues.

Article Abstract

Background And Objectives: Although epinephrine commonly is added to local anesthetics for regional anesthesia, rarely it may cause undesirable hemodynamic side effects. This study compared the hemodynamic and blockade effects of 25 and 200 microg epinephrine during axillary brachial plexus blockade with lidocaine 1.5%.

Methods: Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologist classification I or II patients were divided randomly into 3 groups. Patients in group 1 received 5 mL of saline containing 25 microg epinephrine and then 35 mL of 1.5% lidocaine; patients in group 2 received 5 mL of saline alone and then 200 microg of epinephrine mixed with 35 mL of 1.5% lidocaine; patients in group 3 received 5 mL of saline alone and then 35 mL of 1.5% lidocaine. Hemodynamic data were measured for 1 to 10 minutes at 1-minute intervals after axillary injection. The duration time of motor and sensory block was recorded.

Results: Complete anesthesia was achieved in 85% of patients in groups 1 and 3 and 90% in group 2. Motor block duration was significantly longer in group 2 than in groups 1 and 3 (P <.05). There were no significant differences in analgesia between groups 1 and 2. Analgesia duration was significantly longer in groups 1 and 2 than in group 3 (P <.05). Heart rate from the 3rd to 6th minute was higher in group 2 than in groups 1 and 3 (P <.05). Systolic arterial pressure from the 3rd to 5th minute and diastolic arterial pressure from 2nd to 6th minute were higher in group 2 than in groups 1 and 3 (P <.05).

Conclusions: Low-dose epinephrine offers more stable hemodynamics and similar blockade, and thus may be beneficial for patients undergoing forearm and hand surgery who are at risk for tachycardia and/or hypertension.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1098-7339(03)00225-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

microg epinephrine
12
patients group
12
group received
12
received saline
12
15% lidocaine
12
hemodynamic blockade
8
blockade effects
8
axillary brachial
8
brachial plexus
8
plexus blockade
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!