Background: A significant correlation between the duration and height of esophageal acid exposure and the length of Barrett's mucosa has been demonstrated. The aims of this study were to determine if there is a correlation between hiatal hernia length and Barrett's esophagus length, and to develop a predictive model for Barrett's esophagus length by using hiatal hernia length and duration of esophageal acid exposure.

Methods: Consecutive patients with Barrett's esophagus diagnosed endoscopically were enrolled in the study. Barrett's esophagus was defined by the presence of intestinal metaplasia in biopsy specimens obtained from salmon-colored mucosa extending into the esophagus. Barrett's mucosa 3 cm or greater in length was considered long-segment Barrett's esophagus; and less than 3 cm long was considered short-segment Barrett's esophagus. Hiatal hernia was considered present if the esophagogastric junction was displaced 1 cm or more proximal to the diaphragmatic hiatus.

Results: Twenty-four men (mean age 66.1 +/-2.4 [SE]) with Barrett's esophagus were included in this study. Mean Barrett's length was 4.1 +/-0.7 cm. The Pearson correlation coefficient between hiatal hernia length and Barrett's esophagus length was 0.62 (p < 0.01). Similarly, there was a significant correlation between esophageal acid exposure and Barrett's length (r = 0.62; p < 0.01). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that hiatal hernia length and duration of esophageal acid exposure were associated significantly with length of Barrett's mucosa (R(2) = 0.54; p < 0.001). A regression equation was developed expressing mean Barrett's length (cm) = 0.79 + (0.68) hernia length (cm) + (0.075) duration of esophageal acid exposure (% time pH < 4).

Conclusions: The length of Barrett's mucosa correlated with the length of hiatal hernia. A predictive model for Barrett's length by using hiatal hernia length and duration of esophageal acid exposure was developed. This suggested that these two pathophysiologic factors are good predictors of the length of Barrett's mucosa.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/s0016-5107(03)00007-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

barrett's esophagus
36
hiatal hernia
32
length barrett's
28
hernia length
28
esophageal acid
28
acid exposure
24
length
21
duration esophageal
20
barrett's mucosa
20
barrett's
18

Similar Publications

Introduction: Endoscopic ablation is the mainstay treatment for dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE), of which radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and argon plasma coagulation (APC) are the most widely available options.

Objectives: We aimed to analyze the safety and outcomes of endoscopic ablation for BE within Polish centers.

Patients And Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from three high-volume endoscopy units between 2002-2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Aims: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is widespread in the population and is characterized by the risk of developing Barrett's esophagus and associated adenocarcinoma. Key factors in the progression of the disease are not only the frequency and duration of reflux episodes, but also the resistance of the esophageal mucosa to aggressive reflux molecules. Assessment of the state of tight junction proteins, the rate of their recovery under the influence of various treatment regimens is an urgent task for choosing optimal approaches to curing patients with GERD.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically impacted endoscopy practice. Recommendations were to postpone elective cases, including procedures for removal of luminal neoplasia. This provided a natural experiment to evaluate outcomes related to these decisions and the impact of time to procedure on change in histology.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background/aims: We aimed to clarify the clinicopathological characteristics and causes of Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma (BEA) with unclear demarcation.

Methods: We reviewed BEA cases between January 2010 and August 2022. The lesions were classified into the following two groups: clear demarcation (CD group) and unclear demarcation (UD group).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!