Intravenous ropivacaine bolus is a reliable marker of intravascular injection in premedicated healthy volunteers.

Can J Anaesth

Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Ontario, Canada.

Published: October 2003

Purpose: We designed the following volunteer study to determine if an intravascular bolus dose of ropivacaine could be found that would reliably produce mild symptoms of central nervous system (CNS) toxicity in sedated humans.

Methods: After Ethics Committee approval and informed consent 15 volunteers were recruited. Cardiovascular (CVS) monitoring including pulse oximetry, electrocardiogram and non-invasive blood pressure monitoring was applied. In phase 1, volunteers received in sequence placebo, 30 mg, 45 mg and 60 mg of ropivacaine as a 10-mL iv bolus over 20 sec with a two-hour rest period between each injection to allow plasma clearance of drug. Volunteers were asked to report symptoms of local anesthetic toxicity on a verbal response scale. After any dose volunteers reporting greater than three symptoms with a severity of > 3/10 for greater than three minutes were excluded from further study doses. The dose that consistently produced mild CNS toxic effects was chosen for phase 2 of the study. In phase 2, volunteers were given iv midazolam 0.03 mg*kg(-1) prior to bolus ropivacaine or placebo in a randomized double-blind crossover fashion. Volunteers were asked to report toxic symptoms and venous blood samples were obtained for ropivacaine assay.

Results: In phase 1, ropivacaine 60 mg was found to produce consistent mild symptoms of CNS toxicity. No volunteer experienced major CNS or CVS adverse effect during the study. After midazolam premedication all volunteers reported symptoms with bolus ropivacaine 60 mg. Mean peak ropivacaine venous concentration was 4.48 mg*L(-1).

Conclusion: An intravascular bolus of ropivacaine 60 mg reliably produces mild CNS toxic symptoms in premedicated volunteers.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03019374DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bolus ropivacaine
12
volunteers
9
intravascular bolus
8
ropivacaine
8
ropivacaine reliably
8
mild symptoms
8
cns toxicity
8
phase volunteers
8
volunteers asked
8
asked report
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) is important for enhanced recovery in cardiac surgery. However, the incidence of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) is high and is associated with worsened quality of recovery and life, as well as raised short-term or long-term mortality. The mechanism is not clear, and there is still a lack of safe and effective preventive measures.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Rapid onset of epidural analgesia is an important concern for the parturient. Commonly, the local anaesthetic mixture is administered through the epidural catheter. Drugs administered through the epidural needle might decrease the onset time and enhance the spread of medication within the epidural space.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Interval time, defined as the period of time that effective analgesia can be achieved without the need for patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA), has been investigated as an important parameter for the design of programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) approaches to labor analgesia. PCEA approaches offer flexibility in the management of labor-related pain while minimizing the risk of patient overdose. Here, the optimal interval between PIEB boluses of 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Labor analgesia can be achieved by different approaches. The efficacy and safety of combined dural puncture epidural (DPE) with program intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) are not well characterized. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of DPE combined with PIEB vs epidural (EP) combined with PIEB for labor analgesia.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus vs Manual Epidural Bolus for Labor Analgesia Initiation: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial.

Drug Des Devel Ther

November 2024

Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, People's Republic of China.

Article Synopsis
  • This study compares the effectiveness of a programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) versus a manual bolus for the initial loading dose of labor analgesia in 164 parturients.
  • The main finding is that shortly after administration, both methods provided similar levels of adequate pain relief, with 75.61% for manual and 76.83% for PIEB, showing non-inferiority.
  • Additionally, other factors like pain scores at different times, medication consumption, and side effects were generally similar between the two methods, concluding that PIEB is an effective alternative for initial loading doses.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!