Drotrecogin alfa (activated) improved survival in patients with severe sepsis in PROWESS, a double-blind, study of 1690 adult patients randomized to drotrecogin alfa (activated) at 24 microg/kg/h (N=850) or placebo (N=840) infused for 96 hours. Pharmacodynamic effects of drotrecogin alfa (activated) were assessed with 15 prospectively defined systemic biomarkers of hemostasis, inflammation and endothelial injury. The last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) method of imputation for missing observations was the prospectively defined statistical method. The results were also analyzed with only the observed values without imputation for missing data (repeated measures analysis). With both statistical methods, drotrecogin alfa (activated)-treated patients demonstrated antithrombotic (reduced markers of thrombin generation and accelerated normalization of anticoagulant factor, protein C and fibrinolytic factors) and anticoagulant (prolonged PT and APTT) effects compared with placebo. A profibrinolytic (reduction in plasminogen activator inhibitor-1) effect was significant only with the LOCF imputation method in observed case and percent change from baseline analyses. An anti-inflammatory (reduction in interleukin-6) effect was significant only with the LOCF imputation method in change from baseline and percent change from baseline analyses. Drotrecogin alfa (activated) is a new and promising agent for treatment of patients with severe sepsis. The extensive analysis of systemic biomarkers confirms the previously published antithrombotic effects. However, the present results using different statistical methods do not provide a strong basis for systemic anti-inflammatory or pro-fibrinolytic effects. These latter two effects may occur at the local or cellular level. The systemic biomarkers reported here might not be the most appropriate approach to demonstrate these potential effects of drotrecogin alfa (activated).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH02-11-0270DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

drotrecogin alfa
28
alfa activated
24
patients severe
12
severe sepsis
12
systemic biomarkers
12
change baseline
12
effects drotrecogin
8
prospectively defined
8
imputation missing
8
statistical methods
8

Similar Publications

Hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone for community acquired pneumonia-related septic shock: a subgroup analysis of the APROCCHSS phase 3 randomised trial.

Lancet Respir Med

May 2024

Department of Intensive Care, Raymond Poincaré Hospital, APHP University Versailles Saint Quentin-University Paris Saclay, Garches, France; Institut Hospitalo Universitaire PROMETHEUS, Garches, France; Laboratory of Infection & Inflammation-U1173, School of Medicine, INSERM, University Versailles Saint Quentin-University Paris Saclay, Garches, France; FHU SEPSIS, Garches, France. Electronic address:

Article Synopsis
  • The study explores the effectiveness of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone treatments in patients with septic shock caused by community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) compared to non-CAP cases.
  • It includes data from the phase 3 APROCCHSS trial, which initially tested these treatments across multiple centers in France, focusing specifically on how they impact mortality outcomes.
  • Results indicate that patients with CAP may respond differently to these treatments, and various mortality rates and recovery metrics were analyzed to determine the overall benefit of the steroid regimen.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Septic cardiomyopathy increases mortality by 70% to 90% and results in mechanical dysfunction of cells.

Methods: Here, we created a LPS-induced in-vitro sepsis model with mouse embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (mESC-CM) using the CellDrum technology which simultaneously measures mechanical compliance and beat frequency of mESCs. Visualization of reactive oxygen species (ROS), actin stress fibers, and mRNA quantification of endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR) and protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) before/after LPS incubation were used for method validation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Old drug, new Trick? The rationale for the treatment of COVID-19 with activated protein C.

Med Hypotheses

April 2021

Tufts University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, 2014 Washington Street, Newton, MA 02462, USA. Electronic address:

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, researchers seek to identify efficacious treatments. Current approaches to COVID-19 therapeutics focus on antiviral agents, convalescent plasma, monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulators and more traditional therapies such as steroids [1-6]. Reversing disturbances in coagulation has also been identified as a priority area for candidate therapies, such as through the Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines 4 adaptive clinical trial (ACTIV-4) which is currently evaluating aspirin, heparins and apixaban [7].

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Sepsis is a global health priority. Interventions to reduce the burden of sepsis need to be both effective and cost-effective. We performed a systematic review of the literature on health economic evaluations of sepsis treatments in critically ill adult patients and summarised the evidence for cost-effectiveness.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Sepsis can be defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction due to a dysregulated host response to infection. In sepsis, the coagulation cascade is activated and the balance shifts to the procoagulant side. Recently, the use of protein C is proposed for the treatment of sepsis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!