Background: Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) involves an aberrant behavioral response to normal hormone secretion. Pathogenetic theories posit abnormal modulation of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) transmission in the brain by neuroactive metabolites of progesterone (neurosteroids). In earlier transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies of the motor cortex, we showed that inhibition increases in the luteal phase, consistent with neurosteroid action at the GABA(A) receptor. Here, we studied women with PMS to see if their response to endogenous progesterone differed from that of control subjects.

Methods: We studied nine women with PMS and 14 control subjects during the midfollicular and luteal phases with paired TMS. Subthreshold conditioning TMS was followed by test stimulation that produced a motor evoked potential (MEP) in a hand muscle. We gave pairs at each of seven intervals (2-10 msec) and unconditioned stimuli, measuring the amplitude ratio of the average MEP from the pairs at each interval to that from the unconditioned stimuli (ratio < 1 = inhibition).

Results: Both groups showed the same follicular phase response to paired TMS. Control subjects showed more inhibition in the luteal phase. Women with PMS showed relative facilitation.

Conclusions: This is the first physiological evidence for an abnormal brain response to progesterone in PMS.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01924-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

luteal phase
12
women pms
12
motor cortex
8
premenstrual syndrome
8
studied women
8
control subjects
8
paired tms
8
unconditioned stimuli
8
pms
5
abnormal luteal
4

Similar Publications

Multiple physiological changes occur during the menstrual cycle; many are attributed to fluctuations in estrogen, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and progesterone. These hormones differentially affect the menstrual cycle's follicular, ovulation, and luteal phases. Skin is one of the organs affected by changes in a woman's menstrual cycle.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Prolactin Response to a Submaximal Dose of Ghrelin in Different Phases of the Normal Menstrual Cycle.

Medicina (Kaunas)

December 2024

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larissa, Greece.

A similar secretory pattern of prolactin (PRL) and growth hormone (GH) during the menstrual cycle has been reported in response to a high dose of ghrelin in adult healthy women. The present study aimed to assess the pattern of PRL and GH secretions in response to a submaximal dose of ghrelin during different menstrual phases in adult healthy women. Eight female subjects with normal cyclicity were enrolled.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates the effects of menstrual cycle phases and time of day on various stress and immune biomarkers, including salivary α-amylase (sAA) and secretory immunoglobulin A (SIgA), in a group of 17 participants.
  • No significant interactions were found between menstrual cycle phases and time of day for the biomarkers, resting blood pressure, heart rate, or body composition.
  • However, results indicate that resting heart rate and sAA levels were higher in the afternoon, while SIgA levels were higher in the morning, highlighting the influence of time of day on these markers, rather than the menstrual cycle phases.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) encompasses a range of emotional, physiological, and behavioral symptoms that occur during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle (MC) and resolve with the onset of menstruation. These symptoms, which can include fatigue, physical pain, anxiety, irritability, and depression, significantly affect women's daily lives and overall well-being. In severe cases, PMS can progress to premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD), profoundly impairing quality of life.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Understanding human endometrial dynamics in the establishment of endometrial receptivity remains a challenge, which limits early diagnosis and treatment of endometrial-factor infertility. Here, we decode the endometrial dynamics of fertile women across the window of implantation and characterize the endometrial deficiency in women with recurrent implantation failure. A computational model capable of both temporal prediction and pattern discovery is used to analyze single-cell transcriptomic data from over 220,000 endometrial cells.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!