A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Coronary artery calcium scoring using ECG-gated multidetector CT: effect of individually optimized image-reconstruction windows on image quality and measurement reproducibility. | LitMetric

Objective: We studied the effect of using individually optimized image-reconstruction windows on image quality and measurement reproducibility in coronary artery calcium scoring using ECG-gated multidetector CT (MDCT).

Subjects And Methods: In 50 patients, the coronary arteries were investigated twice with ECG-gated MDCT with 500-msec rotation time. Per scan, three sets of images were reconstructed, respectively, at an image-reconstruction window of 40%, 50%, and 60% of the R-R interval. Image quality was assessed, and the optimal image-reconstruction window per scan and per coronary territory was determined. The interscan variability of calcium mass measurements was calculated for different strategies (use of fixed image-reconstruction window [40%, 50%, or 60%] versus individually optimized image-reconstruction window).

Results: A significant improvement in image quality was obtained by selecting the best of three reconstructed data sets (mean image quality score, 4.4 vs 3.7; p < 0.001). Even with individually optimized image-reconstruction window values, we obtained high values for interscan variability (mean +/- SD, 27% +/- 22% vs 31% +/- 35% with a fixed image-reconstruction window).

Conclusion: The use of individually optimized image-reconstruction windows leads to a significant improvement in image quality. However, interscan variability of calcium mass measurements remains high.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.181.4.1811093DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

image quality
24
individually optimized
20
optimized image-reconstruction
20
image-reconstruction window
16
image-reconstruction windows
12
interscan variability
12
image-reconstruction
9
coronary artery
8
artery calcium
8
calcium scoring
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!