A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Application of the Empore solid-phase extraction membrane to the isolation of drugs from blood: II. Mexiletine and flecainide. | LitMetric

A stabilized therapeutic drug monitoring procedure incorporating the novel Empore solid-phase extraction membrane (SPEM) for isolation of the antiarrhythmic drugs mexiletine (MEX) and flecainide (FLEC) from serum is described. Routinely, serum (0.5 ml), adjusted to pH 4.5, is passed through an octyl (C8) SPEM to extract the drugs. A methanol:water wash follows to remove proteins and interferences. MEX and FLEC are eluted from the membrane with mobile phase and an aliquot is injected directly onto a Zorbax cyanopropyl (CN) high-performance liquid chromatographic column with detection at 214 nm. Evaporating/concentrating techniques that can adversely influence the stability of the volatile MEX are unnecessary. Recovery for both drugs exceeds 90% and the assay is linear from 0.05 mg/L up to at least 6.0 mg/L for MEX and from 0.05 mg/L up to at least 3.0 mg/L for FLEC. Precision (between-run) coefficients of variation range from 2.3 to 3.0% (0.49-1.97 mg/L) for MEX and 3.7 to 5.9% (0.240-0.992 mg/L) for FLEC. Interferences are minimal. When we compared performance of the Empore SPEM and large-particle solid-phase sorbents packed in cartridges, we observed greater capacity per gram of sorbent and smaller elution volume with the membrane. Most important, concentrating steps that adversely affect the stability of MEX are avoided with the SPEM.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007691-199210000-00012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

empore solid-phase
8
solid-phase extraction
8
extraction membrane
8
005 mg/l
8
mg/l mg/l
8
mg/l mex
8
mg/l flec
8
mex
6
mg/l
6
application empore
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!