Stents for nasal vestibule.

J Dermatol Surg Oncol

Department of Dermatology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City 52242.

Published: October 1992

A method employing vinyl polysiloxane and polyethylene chemical tubing to make nasal stents is described. Vinyl polysiloxane stents, when well molded, are comfortable and easily tolerated. The technique has been useful for maintaining patent nares and enhancing graft viability.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.1992.tb02927.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vinyl polysiloxane
8
stents nasal
4
nasal vestibule
4
vestibule method
4
method employing
4
employing vinyl
4
polysiloxane polyethylene
4
polyethylene chemical
4
chemical tubing
4
tubing nasal
4

Similar Publications

Background: This study aimed to compare the precision and trueness of digital impressions of the edentulous arch made with different scanners to conventional physical impressions.

Methods: A total of 40 impressions of a completely edentulous maxillary arch model ( = 10) were made using different digital impressions with an extraoral scanner, E3 3Shape desktop scanner, as the reference scan, intraoral scanner (TRIOS IOS, and Medit IOS) and Vinyl Polysiloxane impressions (VPS) impression using a Computer-Aided Design and Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD-CAM) custom tray. The VPS impression was scanned with the desktop scanner to produce standard tessellation language (STL) files for comparison with the digital impressions made by the Desktop and intraoral scanners.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of distance between dental abutments on the accuracy of one-step and two-step impression techniques with polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) material.

Materials And Methods: Four master models were fabricated with different interabutment distances equal to one, two, three, and four premolar lengths 1-4 (L1, L2, L3, and L4). Seven one-step impressions were taken from each master model using PVS impression material (Group A, n = 7).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Improving the Accuracy of Dental Impressions: A Study of Tray Adjustments and Materials.

Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent

February 2025

Associate Professor, Department Of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, School of Dental Sciences, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, Faridabad, Haryana, India.

Objectives: This study evaluated the tensile bond strength of addition silicone impression material when used with custom trays featuring grooves and perforations, made from self-cure acrylic resin, visible light-cure (VLC) resin, and three-dimensional (3D) printed resin materials.

Materials And Methods: Thirty-six custom trays were fabricated using self-cure acrylic resin (DPI Cold Cure), light-activated acrylic resin (Voco Individo Lux), and 3D-printed resin (Phrozen Aqua 4k). Each material group was divided into two subgroups based on retention methods: grooves and perforations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

BACKGROUND A tooth preparation's clinical requirements and geometric configurations should take precedence over material characteristics when advocating for putty reline impression techniques for permanent restorations, since they require a technically sensitive spacer for light body elastomer. We evaluated the linear dimensional accuracy of vinyl polysiloxane-based putty reline impressions with different spacer acquisition techniques in short-span and long-span fixed partial dentures (FPD). MATERIAL AND METHODS A typodont tooth set simulated a 3-unit (short-span) and a 5-unit (long-span) FPD.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Interocclusal records (IORs) created with bite registration materials (BRMs) accurately reflect the opposing teeth's physiological and anatomical associations in digital and traditional dentistry. This study assessed the linear dimensional accuracy of vinyl polysiloxane-based scannable and transparent BRMs over obligatory clinical time intervals (1, 24, 72, and 168 h/s). A total of 3 scannable [Flexitime Bite, Occlufast CAD, Virtual CADBite] and 3 transparent [Maxill Bite, Charmflex Bite, Defend ClearBite] VPS-based BRMs were divided into 28 subgroups by time interval: 1, 24, 72, and 168 h/s.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!