Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Measurement by Doppler-echocardiography of blood flow rates has the advantage over techniques for the measurement of cardiac output of determining the latter for each valve orifice, and of opening up an approach to the quantification of aortic and mitral regurgitation. This prospective study involving 103 subjects free of any valve leak showed the absence of an significant difference between aortic, pulmonary and mitral ring flow rates in a given individual. Correlations between results obtained at the three measurement sites were: r = 0.92 between aorta and pulmonary artery, r = 0.90 between aorta and mitral ring and r = 0.90 between pulmonary artery and mitral ring. These results support the validation of this technique and would justify its use in the evaluation, quantification and monitoring of mitral and aortic valve leaks.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!