Objective: To determine the importance of hypertension in the aetiology of infarctive and haemorrhagic stroke in persons aged 35-69 years.

Design: A population-based case-control study.

Setting: Lower Hunter Region community.

Subjects: One hundred and ninety patients with a first stroke were identified from a register, including all hospital admissions and death certificates in the Region, and compared with 496 control subjects obtained from a random population sample of the same community.

Main Outcome Measure: First event of stroke (fatal or non-fatal).

Results: Twenty-seven per cent of those with a haemorrhagic stroke, compared with 2% of those with infarctive stroke, died before hospital admission; the in-hospital mortality was 15% and 9%, respectively. Twenty-one per cent of control subjects, compared with 51% of those with stroke, were currently receiving treatment for hypertension. By logistic regression analysis the odds ratio for receiving current treatment for hypertension in those with haemorrhagic stroke was 5.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.36-12.8), compared with 2.53 (95% CI, 1.48-4.34) in those with infarctive stroke. Other differences between haemorrhagic and infarctive stroke included no excess risk in men for haemorrhagic stroke but an odds ratio of 3.51 (95% CI, 1.83-6.74) for infarctive stroke; and a steep risk gradient for obesity in haemorrhagic but not in infarctive stroke. Cigarette smoking carried a non-significant odds ratio of around 1.5, with no difference between stroke type. Among those who had ever been told that they had hypertension, 75% and 71% of patients with infarctive stroke and haemorrhagic stroke, respectively, and 61% of control subjects, were currently receiving treatment for hypertension. In those stroke patients who were currently being treated for hypertension, 63% had a pre-admission diastolic blood pressure of 90 mmHg or more. The mean diastolic blood pressure levels on admission were 10 mmHg higher than the latest recorded pre-hospital measurements and fell to 10 mmHg lower than the levels recorded before hospital admission by the time of discharge.

Conclusion: Hypertension is important in the aetiology of both infarctive and haemorrhagic strokes, although it may be more important in haemorrhagic stroke, and there appear to be other aetiological differences between stroke types. Most of the patients with a history of hypertension were currently receiving treatment for hypertension, although blood pressure control before admission was not optimal.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

haemorrhagic stroke
28
infarctive stroke
24
stroke
20
treatment hypertension
16
hypertension aetiology
12
aetiology infarctive
12
infarctive haemorrhagic
12
control subjects
12
currently receiving
12
receiving treatment
12

Similar Publications

In clinical practice, the impact of procedural or patient-related risk factors on 1-year clinical outcomes in patients receiving 1-month of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear. Using data from the multi-center REIWA registry which included patients treated with thin-strut biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent (BP-DES) and 1-month DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy, we assessed the primary endpoint (a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, and major or minor bleeding) in patients with and without procedural (treatment of three vessels, three or more lesions, three or more stents, bifurcation with two stents, long stenting, and target of chronic total occlusion) and patient-related risk factor (renal insufficiency, anemia, peripheral vascular disease, prior or current history of heart failure and advanced age of ≥ 75 years). Among the 1,202 patients who underwent complete revascularization by PCI, 276 (23.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Antiplatelet drugs represent potential candidates for protecting the penumbral microcirculation during cerebral ischemia and improving the benefits of arterial recanalization in ischemic stroke. Yet while the efficacy of such adjuvant strategies has been shown to be highly time dependent, antiplatelet therapy at the acute phase of ischemic stroke cannot be envisioned until the diagnosis of stroke and its ischemic nature have been confirmed because of the presumed risk of worsening bleeding in case of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Here, we investigated this risk for 2 antiplatelet drugs currently being tested in clinical trials for ischemic stroke, glenzocimab and eptifibatide, in 2 mouse models of ICH.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Anti-Amyloid Therapies for Alzheimer's Disease and Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities: Implications for the Emergency Medicine Clinician.

Ann Emerg Med

January 2025

Departments of Emergency Medicine & Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY; Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, NY.

Alzheimer's disease is the neurodegenerative disorder responsible for approximately 60% to 70% of all cases of dementia and is expected to affect 152 million by 2050. Recently, anti-amyloid therapies have been developed and approved by the Food and Drug Administration as disease-modifying treatments given as infusions every 2 to 5 weeks for Alzheimer's disease. Although this is an important milestone in mitigating Alzheimer's disease progression, it is critical for emergency medicine clinicians to understand what anti-amyloid therapies are and how they work to recognize, treat, and mitigate their adverse effects.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has revolutionized the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Still, the efficacy and safety in patients older than 85 years of age are not conclusive by the present randomized controlled trials' data (RCT). Aging is a multifactorial process and the impact of MT on this specific population needs to be further analyzed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To assess the efficacy of endovascular treatment and clinical outcomes in individuals with symptomatic intracranial stenosis who had not responded adequately to medical intervention.

Methods: The study included 32 patients who received endovascular treatment due to high-grade (70%-99% severity) intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis from December 2021 to December 2023. The patients had not experienced any acute ischemic or hemorrhagic infarction within the last three weeks, had a Modified Rankin Scale score of ≤3 at baseline, and developed a transient ischemic attack or non-disabling stroke despite having received the best medical treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!