Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The stress distribution around dental implants was investigated by use of a two-dimensional model of the mandible with two implants. A vertical load of 100 N was imposed on abutments or the bar connection. The stress was calculated for a number of superstructures under different loading conditions with the help of the finite element method. The length of the implants and the height of the mandible were also varied. A model with solitary abutments showed a more uniform distribution of the stress when compared with a model with connected abutments. The largest compressive stress was also less in the model without the bar. Using shorter implants did not have a large influence on the stress around the implants. When the height of the mandible was reduced, a substantially larger stress was found in the bone around the implants because of a larger overall deformation of the lower jaw.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90293-j | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!