Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(195610)12:4<366::aid-jclp2270120414>3.0.co;2-gDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

scorer's reliability
4
reliability quantitative
4
quantitative scoring
4
scoring h-t-p
4
h-t-p technique
4
scorer's
1
quantitative
1
scoring
1
h-t-p
1
technique
1

Similar Publications

Background Identifying students who are low scorers is essential for providing timely interventions and support. Traditional methods of identifying such students often rely on summative assessments, such as end-of-term exams. However, formative assessments offer valuable insights into students' understanding, strengths, and weaknesses.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This study evaluated the reliability and validity of the In-Out-Test for detecting episodic memory deficits in stroke patients and explored its potential as a clinical test.

Methods: A total of 75 stroke patients and 120 healthy controls underwent tests, including the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Picture-Based Memory Impairment Screen (PMIS), and In-Out-Test. Reliability metrics (Cronbach's α, inter-scorer reliability, test-retest reliability), criterion validity, corrected item-total correlation, hierarchical regression analysis and ROC curve analysis were performed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the In-Out-Test.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: Whether case-based modified essay questions (MEQs) are crucial to summative assessment in medical curriculum is still debatable. The current study aimed to evaluate third-year medical students' performance in case-based MEQs and multiple-choice questions (MCQs) in summative assessment in the endocrine module.

Methods: Students' scores in mid and final module MEQs and MCQs were analyzed over four successive years from 2018/2019 to 2021/2022, where comparisons were made between students' scores in MEQs and MCQs, and between scores of students of different categories.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Shared decision-making (SDM) between parents facing extremely preterm delivery and the medical team is recommended to develop the best course of action for neonatal care. We aimed to describe the creation and testing of a literature-based checklist to assess SDM practices for consultation with parents facing extremely preterm delivery.

Study Design: The checklist of SDM counseling behaviors was created after literature review and with expert consensus.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The study focuses on psychological risk factors like body dysmorphic disorder and unrealistic expectations that can lead to patient dissatisfaction with aesthetic procedures, highlighting the importance of preoperative screening for both patients' well-being and practitioners' protection.
  • - Researchers validated the Cosmetic Readiness Questionnaire (CRQ) through two studies involving over 8,000 participants, confirming its ability to assess psychological factors that could impact aesthetic treatment outcomes.
  • - The CRQ's five key areas—Body Dysmorphia, Psychological Distress, Self-Criticism, Unrealistic Expectations, and Lack of Openness—were shown to predict dissatisfaction, with high-scoring individuals 78% more likely to report negative experiences after cosmetic procedures.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!