A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Alfentanil/promazine versus meperidine/promazine as a sedative regimens during local analgesia for cataract operation. | LitMetric

The influence of two intravenous (IV) sedative regimens on intra-ocular pressure (IOP) was investigated in conjunction with retrobulbar local analgesia. Forty patients of either sex, and similar age with body weight within 40-90 kg were allocated equally and randomly to two groups: Group A (alfentanil/promazine) and group M (meperidine/promazine). Measurement of IOP, systolic pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate, PaCO2, PaO2 and O2 saturation were made before operation, after premedication, after IV sedation and post-operatively. In the Alfentanil group there was significantly stronger decrease of IOP (p < 0.001). In group A the IOP dropped from 18.1 +/- 3.2 mm Hg to 10.3 +/- 2.7 mm Hg, i.e. 43%, while in group M the reduction IOP was from 17.6 +/- 3.5 mm Hg to 12.6 +/- 1.9 mm Hg, i.e. 28.4%. Meperidine caused a significant increase in PaCO2 (4.2 +/- 0.3 mm Hg), however this increase was not sufficient to cause the IOP alterations. The oxygen saturation was lower in group M (decreased by 1.5 +/- 1% in group M versus decrease by 1.0 +/- 1.2% in group A). Cardiovascular parameters were more stable in group A. In conclusion the alfentanil regimen produced a better reduction of the IOP with excellent sedation, operative condition and least anaesthetic side effects.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00160766DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

group
9
sedative regimens
8
local analgesia
8
reduction iop
8
iop
7
+/-
7
alfentanil/promazine versus
4
versus meperidine/promazine
4
meperidine/promazine sedative
4
regimens local
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!