Nasal fracture manipulation: a comparative study of general and local anaesthesia techniques.

Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci

Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Capital Coast and District Health Board, Wellington, New Zealand.

Published: October 2003

Nasal injuries are common conditions treated in either Otolaryngology or Plastic Surgical departments. Manipulation for deformity can be conducted in various ways. The aim of this study is to determine if the anaesthetic technique used for manipulation influences outcomes. Five hundred and fifty-five patients had either local anaesthetic (LA) or general anaesthetic (GA) nasal fracture manipulations in our departments over a 6-year period. Three hundred and twenty-four of these could be contacted and questioned as to subsequent surgical treatments received. Rhinoplasty, septorhinoplasty or septoplasty had been subsequently performed in 3.2% of the GA group and in 17.2% of the LA group (P < 0.0001). We recommend considering this result when treating nasal fractures in conjunction with other important issues of patient preference, financial costs, associated risks, morbidity and facilities available.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2273.2003.00754.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nasal fracture
8
nasal
4
fracture manipulation
4
manipulation comparative
4
comparative study
4
study general
4
general local
4
local anaesthesia
4
anaesthesia techniques
4
techniques nasal
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!