The aim of the present work was to compare the efficacies and levels of selectivity of different culture-dependent and -independent methods for analyzing bifidobacteria in human stool samples. The three different culture media used here significantly differed from each other, particularly with regard to the recovery of Bifidobacterium adolescentis. Bifidobacterium medium failed to recover B. adolescentis; Beerens medium recovered some B. adolescentis organisms (17% of total bifidobacteria), whereas tomato-Eugon medium recovered mainly B. adolescentis organisms (58% of total bifidobacteria). A culture-independent method that combines GC fractionation of bacterial community DNA and 16S rRNA sequencing indicated that B. adolescentis organisms accounted for 85% of all bifidobacteria. Methodological biases, such as those described in this paper, should be taken into account in interpreting earlier studies and designing future experiments.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC194935PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.9.5731-5735.2003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

adolescentis organisms
12
medium recovered
8
recovered adolescentis
8
total bifidobacteria
8
adolescentis
5
selective plating
4
plating underestimates
4
underestimates abundance
4
abundance differential
4
differential recovery
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!