Purpose: Long-term cosmesis from the patient's perspective is compared to the doctor's appraisal. Factors that determine judgment of cosmesis are analyzed. Also, a patient questionnaire was designed to screen for normal tissue reactions and is evaluated.
Methods And Patients: With structured questions, patients rated their satisfaction considering cosmesis, the difference in overall appearance, and specific changes of the breast. Two doctors rated cosmesis and radiation late effects (LENT/SOMA). Ratings were compared, and the relative impact of single items was studied. Two hundred eighty-seven patients with unilateral breast carcinoma were examined after a median follow-up of 8 years. They were treated between 1981 and 1995 with lumpectomy and radiotherapy of the breast with 1.8-2.5 Gy fractions with a median total dose of 55 Gy (range: 50-65 Gy).
Results: One hundred sixty-one patients rated cosmesis as satisfying, 73 patients rated it as acceptable, and 25 patients as poor. Eighty-nine patients noted severe changes of appearance. Severe firmness and extensive scars were the most frequent complaint; the most important single item for judging cosmesis as poor was highly visible scars. Generally, doctors rated cosmesis less favorably (satisfactory, 150 patients; poor, 43 patients). Severe fibrosis was more important than discoloration of the breast or scars. Correlation between patients' and doctors' rating of cosmesis was modest (Cohen's weighted kappa 0.29), whereas the doctor's rating correlated well (0.55). Specificity and sensitivity of the questionnaire item for severe fibrosis (using doctors' judgments as gold standard) was 0.8; Cohen's weighted kappa was 0.34 (95% confidence interval: 0.21-0.48).
Conclusion: Rating of cosmesis is subjective. Patients' satisfaction with cosmesis is greater than the doctors' and is determined not only by radiation late effects, but also by factors unrelated to the appearance of the breast. Severe fibrosis may be detected by a patient questionnaire.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00589-3 | DOI Listing |
BMC Health Serv Res
January 2025
Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Background: This mixed methods study identified needed refinements to a telehealth-delivered cultural and linguistic adaptation of Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy for Chinese patients with advanced cancer (MCP-Ch) to enhance acceptability, comprehensibility, and implementation of the intervention in usual care settings, guided by the Ecological Validity Model (EVM) and the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM).
Methods: Fifteen purposively sampled mental health professionals who work with Chinese cancer patients completed surveys providing Likert-scale ratings on acceptability and comprehensibility of MCP-Ch content (guided by the EVM) and pre-implementation factors (guided by PRISM), followed by semi-structured interviews. Survey data were descriptively summarized and linked to qualitative interview data.
Knee Surg Relat Res
January 2025
IU Health Physicians Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, 1801 N Senate Ave, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Background: There are no studies that compare the outcomes and complications of single-versus two-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) after primary ACLR failure. This purpose of this study is to examine clinical and functional outcomes and complications associated with single and two-stage revision ACLR after primary ACLR failure.
Methods: All patients who underwent single or two-stage revision ACLR after primary ACLR failure between 2012 and 2021 with a minimum of a 2 year follow-up were included.
BMC Cancer
January 2025
Patient Centered Solutions, IQVIA, Reading, UK.
Background: Despite approvals of new first-line immunotherapies for advanced/metastatic gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer (aGC/GEJC), patients' median survival is around 14 months and their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is affected by disease-related symptoms and treatment-related side effects. Using a targeted literature review (TLR) and patient interviews, this study identified disease- and treatment-related concepts that are important to patients with aGC/GEJC and their HRQoL.
Methods: A TLR was conducted to identify primary qualitative studies from 2018 to 2021 on patients' experiences with aGC/GEJC.
Neurol Ther
January 2025
Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc., 12780 El Camino Real, San Diego, CA, 92130, USA.
Introduction: Chorea is the primary manifestation of Huntington's disease. Different clinicians pursue varied approaches to chorea management, and real-world evidence describing them is needed. The objective of this study was to assess the presence and severity of chorea, chorea pharmacotherapy, and treatment practice, and patterns in a large natural-history cohort with Huntington's disease.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Oral Investig
January 2025
Department of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, 38039, Kayseri, Türkiye.
Objectives: This study evaluates the effect of different irrigation solutions for postoperative pain in the regenerative endodontic treatments (RET) of necrotic teeth with open apex.
Materials And Methods: This study included necrotic, deeply carious lower molars of 42 patients. Access cavities of the teeth were opened and working lengths were measured at the first visit.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!