Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
First vaccines are traditionally licensed after showing favourable results from phase III efficacy trials. Subsequent competing vaccines, however, have been licensed primarily on the basis of immunogenicity data rather than clinical efficacy. Focusing on pneumococcal vaccines where optical densities are measured and serum antibody concentrations are 'estimated' (from a statistical model) using an immunoglobulin (IgG) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), the focus of this paper will centre on two highly related issues: the determination of an upper limit for quality control used in the assay methodology (let us call it the maximum tolerated limit or MTL) and the identification of vaccine responders. The goal is to show that these two issues are inter-related, so that investigators could reduce misclassification which would interfere with the eventual comparison of immunogenicity results.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.1530 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!