Background: Liposuction is the most commonly performed cosmetic surgical procedure in the United States. Traditional liposuction (TL) performed under general anesthesia has been associated with reports of major systemic complications, including death. When TL is performed using only tumescent anesthesia, there have been no reported deaths and few significant systemic complications. Power liposuction (PL), a newer procedure in which a reciprocating cannula is used to evacuate fat, has reported benefits over TL.
Objective: To determine the complication rate associated with PL and to compare it with TL (regardless of the type of anesthesia).
Methods: In this study, 207 consecutive PL cases performed with tumescent anesthesia between August 2000 and May 2002 by a dermatologic surgeon (B.K.) and a plastic surgeon (M.B.) were reviewed retrospectively to determine the number of complications associated with the PL procedure.
Results: No systemic complications were identified, and only three local complications (all seromas) were found. This represents a complication rate of 1.4%.
Conclusion: Our results demonstrate fewer complications when performing PL using tumescent anesthesia compared with TL using general anesthesia. When compared with TL using tumescent anesthesia, the overall complication rate did not differ significantly. We conclude that in addition to PL previously demonstrated benefits, the complication profile compares favorably with TL under local tumescent anesthesia. Therefore, PL may assume a more prominent role in the armamentarium of the surgeon performing liposuction.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-4725.2003.29253.x | DOI Listing |
Burns
December 2024
Burn & Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery,Azienda Ospedaliera Cannizzaro, Via Messina 829, Catania, Italy.
Introduction: Burn injuries are a global health challenge, causing significant pain, tissue damage and complex wound management issues. Traditional treatments like surgical debridement, while effective, pose challenges such as blood loss, grafting requirements, and prolonged hospital stays. Enzymatic debridement, such as the Nexobrid procedure, effectively removes necrotic tissue but can be painful for patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAesthetic Plast Surg
January 2025
, 433 N Camden Dr #770, Beverly Hills, CA, 90210, USA.
Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the most feared complications of abdominoplasty, and multiple studies in the plastic surgery literature have sought to prevent these complications. General inhalational anesthesia can increase the risk of VTE via a variety of mechanisms. This study evaluates whether performing abdominoplasties under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) instead of general inhalational anesthesia can reduce the risk of VTE.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWiad Lek
December 2024
STATE INSTITUTION OF SCIENCE ≪CENTER OF INNOVATIVE HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGIES≫ STATE ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT, KYIV, UKRAINE.
Objective: Aim: To compare the effectiveness of tumescent anesthesia and regional anesthesia under ultrasound guidance in terms of their impact on nociceptive and stress systems, as well as systemic hemodynamics, in patients with chronic venous disease of the lower extremities, undergoing surgical treatment.
Patients And Methods: Materials and Methods: Fifty patients (average age 48 ±15 years; 19 [38 %] males and 31 [62 %] females) with chronic venous disease of the lower extremities, who underwent surgical treatment (endovenous laser ablation and miniphlebectomy on one limb), were examined. Twenty-five patients (main group) underwent surgery under femoral nerve block with 150 mg of lidocaine and sciatic nerve block (popliteal fossa) with 150 mg of lidocaine under ultrasound guidance.
Ann Vasc Surg
December 2024
Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Frankston Hospital, Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Background: Treatment of symptomatic varicose veins has changed dramatically in the last few years with guidelines now recommending endovenous surgery as first-line intervention. Previously, this was achieved by laser or radiofrequency ablation of the target vein, requiring infiltration of tumescent anesthesia to reduce the risks of thermal damage to surrounding tissue. Endovenous cyanoacrylate injection (VenaSeal™) is a nonthermal, nontumescent endovenous closure technique, increasing patient comfort and is readily performed under local anesthesia only and thus is a feasible technique for in-room treatment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCirc Arrhythm Electrophysiol
December 2024
Division of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Department of Medicine (B.K.H., G.G., F.E.M., D.S.F., T.M.M.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!