Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The authors analyze the effect of psychologic adaptation of 108 pregnant women to the clinical course of their labor. Psychologic adaptation of pregnant women was assessed by the method of comprehensive personality analysis (the adapted variant of the Minnesota personality questionnaire). Two groups of women were distinguished: Group 1, 30 women (27.7%) with effective psychologic adaptation and Group 2, 78 women (72.3%) with disordered psychologic adaptation abilities. Disco-ordination of the uterine contractions (primary and secondary uterine inertia, early rupture of amniotic membranes, abnormal preliminary period), fetal and neonatal hypoxia, injuries to the soft tissues of the birth routes were more often observed in Group 2 women than in Group 1.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!