AI Article Synopsis

  • The paper discusses a 2002 meeting on Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) held in Rensselaerville, NY, focusing on current advancements and future directions in the field, involving 92 researchers from various countries.
  • BCIs use brain activity, such as EEG or single-neuron signals, to enable users to control devices like cursors or neuroprosthetics, relying on a translation algorithm to interpret brain signals into commands.
  • To enhance the speed and accuracy of BCIs, improvements are needed in technology and user training, necessitating collaboration among diverse fields and a focus on user needs to develop practical applications.

Article Abstract

This paper summarizes the Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control, The Second International Meeting, held in Rensselaerville, NY, in June 2002. Sponsored by the National Institutes of Health and organized by the Wadsworth Center of the New York State Department of Health, the meeting addressed current work and future plans in brain-computer interface (BCI) research. Ninety-two researchers representing 38 different research groups from the United States, Canada, Europe, and China participated. The BCIs discussed at the meeting use electroencephalographic activity recorded from the scalp or single-neuron activity recorded within cortex to control cursor movement, select letters or icons, or operate neuroprostheses. The central element in each BCI is a translation algorithm that converts electrophysiological input from the user into output that controls external devices. BCI operation depends on effective interaction between two adaptive controllers, the user who encodes his or her commands in the electrophysiological input provided to the BCI, and the BCI that recognizes the commands contained in the input and expresses them in device control. Current BCIs have maximum information transfer rates of up to 25 b/min. Achievement of greater speed and accuracy requires improvements in signal acquisition and processing, in translation algorithms, and in user training. These improvements depend on interdisciplinary cooperation among neuroscientists, engineers, computer programmers, psychologists, and rehabilitation specialists, and on adoption and widespread application of objective criteria for evaluating alternative methods. The practical use of BCI technology will be determined by the development of appropriate applications and identification of appropriate user groups, and will require careful attention to the needs and desires of individual users.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tnsre.2003.814799DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

brain-computer interface
8
second international
8
international meeting
8
activity recorded
8
electrophysiological input
8
bci
6
interface technology
4
technology review
4
review second
4
meeting
4

Similar Publications

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been widely utilized for decoding motor imagery (MI) from electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. However, extracting discriminative spatial-temporal-spectral features from low signal-to-noise ratio EEG signals remains challenging. This paper proposes MBMSNet , a multi-branch, multi-scale, and multi-view CNN with a lightweight temporal attention mechanism for EEG-Based MI decoding.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Modeling multi-channel electroencephalographic (EEG) time-series is a challenging tasks, even for the most recent deep learning approaches. Particularly, in this work, we targeted our efforts to the high-fidelity reconstruction of this type of data, as this is of key relevance for several applications such as classification, anomaly detection, automatic labeling, and brain-computer interfaces.

Methods: We analyzed the most recent works finding that high-fidelity reconstruction is seriously challenged by the complex dynamics of the EEG signals and the large inter-subject variability.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The pursuit of artificial neural networks that mirror the accuracy, efficiency and low latency of biological neural networks remains a cornerstone of artificial intelligence (AI) research. Here, we incorporated recent neuroscientific findings of self-inhibiting autapse and neuron heterogeneity for innovating a spiking neural network (SNN) with enhanced learning and memorizing capacities. A bi-level programming paradigm was formulated to respectively learn neuron-level biophysical variables and network-level synapse weights for nested heterogeneous learning.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology can enhance neural plasticity and motor recovery in persons with stroke. However, the effects of BCI training with motor imagery (MI)-contingent feedback versus MI-independent feedback remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether the contingent connection between MI-induced brain activity and feedback influences functional and neural plasticity outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A BEM-FMM TMS Coil Designer Using MATLAB Platform.

Brain Stimul

January 2025

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA, 01609; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA 02129; Department of Mathematics, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA, 01609.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!