Background: We compared 4 kinds of alaryngeal speech available in Taiwan in the performance of daily-life tasks. The speech methods included pneumatic device (Taiwan tube), electrolaryngeal speech, esophageal speech, and tracheoesophageal prosthesis.

Methods: Questionnaires covering various communication situations in daily-life tasks as well as subjective feelings about using alaryngeal speech were distributed to members of The Taiwan Laryngectomees' Association and were collected mostly in April 2000 in their annual meeting.

Results: A total of 108 members responded to the questionnaire (totally 160 were questionnaires distributed). The mean age of respondents was 68.6 years, and the average time after surgery was 14.5 years. A pneumatic device was used by 58.8% of the responders, esophageal speech was used by 24.7%, an electrolarynx by 10.3%, and a tracheoesophageal prosthesis by 6.2%. No statistical difference was noted among patients using any of the 4 devices in terms of 13 communication tasks in daily life, except 4 questions such as the convenience of alaryngeal speech, embarrassment in face of strangers, the effort required to speak, and the discomfort in throat/neck/mouth when speaking. No statistical differences were noted among the 4 devices in terms of intelligibility.

Conclusions: All 4 alaryngeal speech methods can serve most of the communication functions in daily life tasks with no differences in intelligibility. Limitations in loudness and tone were common problems. It is crucial for surgeons to understand the performance of various alaryngeal speeches in daily life during rehabilitation consultations with patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

alaryngeal speech
20
daily life
12
speech
9
daily-life tasks
8
speech methods
8
pneumatic device
8
esophageal speech
8
devices terms
8
alaryngeal
6
voice rehabilitation
4

Similar Publications

Prosodic Preferences of Surface Electromyography-based Subvocal Speech for People With Laryngectomy.

J Voice

December 2024

Delsys, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts 01760; Altec, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts 01760; Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215. Electronic address:

Introduction: People who undergo a total laryngectomy lose their natural voice and depend on alaryngeal technologies for communication. However, these technologies are often difficult to use and lack prosody. Surface electromyographic-based silent speech interfaces are novel communication systems that overcome many of the shortcomings of traditional alaryngeal speech and have the potential to seamlessly incorporate individualized prosody.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • In Germany, around 950-1200 laryngectomies are performed each year due to serious throat cancers, which lead to major changes in voice and communication abilities, impacting mental health and social interactions.
  • A multidisciplinary rehabilitation team is essential to help patients regain their communication skills through various methods like pseudowhispering, esophageal speech, and tracheoesophageal speech prostheses.
  • Tracheoesophageal speech prostheses are considered the best option for clear voice production, but they require regular healthcare visits for maintenance, and educating patients on these methods is crucial for their social reintegration.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Patient Perspectives in Postlaryngectomy Communication Rehabilitation and Outcomes.

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

November 2024

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.

Objective: To evaluate patient-reported outcomes in postlaryngectomy communication rehabilitation.

Study Design: Cross-sectional survey study.

Setting: (a) Patients who underwent laryngectomy at a single institution and (b) members of the International Association of Laryngectomees (IAL).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Stapling-assisted closure of pharyngeal mucosa during total laryngectomy was described in 1973.Few authors have demonstrated that this technique provides a faster and more reliable pharyngeal closure with ashorter operative period. However, the simultaneous placement of tracheoesophageal prostheses is quitechallenging and affects the patient's speech rehabilitation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Loss of the larynx significantly alters natural voice production, requiring alternative communication modalities and rehabilitation methods to restore speech intelligibility and improve the quality of life of affected individuals. This paper explores advances in alaryngeal speech enhancement to improve signal quality and reduce background noise, focusing on individuals who have undergone laryngectomy. In this study, speech samples were obtained from 23 Lithuanian males who had undergone laryngectomy with secondary implantation of the tracheoesophageal prosthesis (TEP).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!