Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
We investigated the relationship between the antinociceptive effect of the opiate agonist loperamide at the spinal level and its inhibitory effect on calcium influx. Intrathecal administration of loperamide showed a significant antinociceptive effect in the formalin test, which was not prevented by naloxone. On the other hand, no significant effects were observed by nicardipine, an L-type specific blocker, or by BAY K8644, an L-type specific agonist, suggesting no significant role of L-type calcium channels in nociceptive signal transduction. Loperamide suppressed the calcium influx in dorsal root ganglion neurons. As the antinociceptive effect of loperamide was not affected by naloxone or other calcium channel blocking toxins, and loperamide showed a direct inhibitory effect on calcium-influx, the analgesic effect of intrathecally injected loperamide might be due to its blockade of the voltage-dependent calcium channels at the terminals of the primary afferent fibers.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0168-0102(03)00126-3 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!