Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
This work investigates the coupling of a membrane technique, ultrafiltration, with a recent adsorbent, activated carbon cloth for the treatment of industrial highly coloured wastewaters. A first experimental part shows the high treatment ability of this process for fountain-pen inks effluents arising from the rinsing of vats in which inks were produced. Whereas ultrafiltration enables more than 97% of colour removal, COD and DOC are not completely retained and a residual value of 1,700 mg l(-1) of DOC is obtained in the permeate. The second step of the process, activated carbon cloth, allows residual organic matter to be removed and a complete discolouring of the permeate. Adsorption capacities of COD and DOC are high, equal to 500 and 250 mg g(-1) respectively. Furthermore, this adsorbent induces a complete removal of glycol compounds (acting as antifreeze) which were not retined by a nanofiltration technique. A second part is an evaluation of the economic feasibility of such an integrated process. Only direct costs are considered at this phase of the study, and are divided into fixed costs (equipment, depreciation, maintenance), variable costs (electricity and consumption) and labour costs. The technical-economic study is carried out for two configurations: a low capacity unit (the UF membrane area is 2.4 m2) and an industrial capacity unit (with a 100 m2 UF membrane). Costs per treated m3 are respectively 111 and 32 euros, with costs partitioning which are dependent on the unit capacity.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593330309385610 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!